Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3916446ybz; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:34:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIHvhE/agb8aZUnWf4bzTP3dyUz9UytBN1LDtJld2Y8Jwy7bEV7LpzC9B792xnVVrbRYyne X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:534b:: with SMTP id j11mr4781710ejo.142.1588066488860; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:34:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588066488; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fVyqM2kVTx/pCXawGogxdfamOs8EgD0LcoAi8Y3uoldZTwdq/3gRHlUFvHhIqP+ygj Z97s5LvJVcNcSaeviG2CwZ+QAKZTu5SeqrPDQs8+ZHCX+JlA5USLxmkST9yYvV/ZO42j Sm6azwrQ7m1948b9qNk6BeDGfaMvga3zk6nymc2I0CTx0/0DAdZmYHbc004FAQZD80mb x8uffNjwOUypb1l9QRM74onfO2Ojhf01uX+BHhuFuNjucQs4VPM4GHIRUk7kxAPibSPN 9dNlRDWexJKYQaBu0H6pA2EIirdCWvqhpnPS60nK9E7wiIaBDShXp9ikcKcb3k1sutrP usyw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=m2catzEVGaGQBeicoszOHD+dKwsEKdM2O9/HDn+lnHE=; b=ivnp7+KDYuIKG01qyk5d6alSPvzcP4vP43opTtCfzrne2G16zPcnR1REU4Z69XN9jw ZKWuFhhAJs7kpnnbyK9+f8vyF+k7/7QJPzvar8gezLLOTDEdfYX0bFzMGE3OMROzkIjQ yFkRNyQhDmzKC8SEtMC38Jj/prsOAlTYiD8GloSeIlsY4q5/U+IFwhTWQRrmiqiidX+t /ciyoYUz+DgAqaR5mG3CtXy2BRx+u5WGkI8t4c4odqeHFQy2iuIm0obhR+BJ3dc4hYvN g1J0GX1sovOq9FPUjRnFl2JE3mBWMypluhvfM2JrqxTNk50P/t+fABKQnwb9hQcmXgv6 ccFg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x27si1567837ejc.450.2020.04.28.02.34.26; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727078AbgD1Jc4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 05:32:56 -0400 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:5562 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726477AbgD1Jc4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 05:32:56 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,326,1583164800"; d="scan'208";a="90638122" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2020 17:32:51 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.204]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFFC50A9991; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:32:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.167.225.141] (10.167.225.141) by G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:32:46 +0800 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOWbnuWkjTogUmU6IFtSRkMgUEFUQ0ggMC84XSBkYXg6IEFkZCBh?= =?UTF-8?Q?_dax-rmap_tree_to_support_reflink?= To: Dave Chinner CC: Matthew Wilcox , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "darrick.wong@oracle.com" , "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , "hch@lst.de" , "rgoldwyn@suse.de" , "Qi, Fuli" , "Gotou, Yasunori" References: <20200427084750.136031-1-ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20200427122836.GD29705@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200428064318.GG2040@dread.disaster.area> From: Ruan Shiyang Message-ID: <259fe633-e1ff-b279-cd8c-1a81eaa40941@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:32:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200428064318.GG2040@dread.disaster.area> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.167.225.141] X-ClientProxiedBy: G08CNEXCHPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.203) To G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.204) X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 3DFFC50A9991.AE2A1 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-Spam-Status: No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/4/28 下午2:43, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:09:47AM +0000, Ruan, Shiyang wrote: >> >> 在 2020/4/27 20:28:36, "Matthew Wilcox" 写道: >> >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:47:42PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote: >>>> This patchset is a try to resolve the shared 'page cache' problem for >>>> fsdax. >>>> >>>> In order to track multiple mappings and indexes on one page, I >>>> introduced a dax-rmap rb-tree to manage the relationship. A dax entry >>>> will be associated more than once if is shared. At the second time we >>>> associate this entry, we create this rb-tree and store its root in >>>> page->private(not used in fsdax). Insert (->mapping, ->index) when >>>> dax_associate_entry() and delete it when dax_disassociate_entry(). >>> >>> Do we really want to track all of this on a per-page basis? I would >>> have thought a per-extent basis was more useful. Essentially, create >>> a new address_space for each shared extent. Per page just seems like >>> a huge overhead. >>> >> Per-extent tracking is a nice idea for me. I haven't thought of it >> yet... >> >> But the extent info is maintained by filesystem. I think we need a way >> to obtain this info from FS when associating a page. May be a bit >> complicated. Let me think about it... > > That's why I want the -user of this association- to do a filesystem > callout instead of keeping it's own naive tracking infrastructure. > The filesystem can do an efficient, on-demand reverse mapping lookup > from it's own extent tracking infrastructure, and there's zero > runtime overhead when there are no errors present. > > At the moment, this "dax association" is used to "report" a storage > media error directly to userspace. I say "report" because what it > does is kill userspace processes dead. The storage media error > actually needs to be reported to the owner of the storage media, > which in the case of FS-DAX is the filesytem. Understood. BTW, this is the usage in memory-failure, so what about rmap? I have not found how to use this tracking in rmap. Do you have any ideas? > > That way the filesystem can then look up all the owners of that bad > media range (i.e. the filesystem block it corresponds to) and take > appropriate action. e.g. I tried writing a function to look up all the owners' info of one block in xfs for memory-failure use. It was dropped in this patchset because I found out that this lookup function needs 'rmapbt' to be enabled when mkfs. But by default, rmapbt is disabled. I am not sure if it matters... > > - if it falls in filesytem metadata, shutdown the filesystem > - if it falls in user data, call the "kill userspace dead" routines > for each mapping/index tuple the filesystem finds for the given > LBA address that the media error occurred > > Right now if the media error is in filesystem metadata, the > filesystem isn't even told about it. The filesystem can't even shut > down - the error is just dropped on the floor and it won't be until > the filesystem next tries to reference that metadata that we notice > there is an issue. Understood. Thanks. > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- Thanks, Ruan Shiyang.