Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3924624ybz; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:43:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIfgoQ4Wp75rv9KyTxtWf+usaUhuO5o9ftQXP44rBD9Dy4VIjQCIybY90M482Mx/UD1xhSz X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4c8e:: with SMTP id q14mr24708449eju.208.1588067036411; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:43:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588067036; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BayqMXJziZrUxyeQKIJoaWRm12WX8YOLownWrJJVWtMT9npd21lnnwQYGfHTFgZZX2 nA8MDKggyq/8YU4z5O3UOzSirMhHlksOGrsDPGnj3yXPeqf6W7Ay70qtC+3ImwxcIZEo qq0XEWi1XESpJStafR1kPI8wQi3WRIqxVqgKrXB+xog3EV+ouKqeMKnSiahc5HCb6LS+ n/9B8Pcd9Io5J+gN0IyjYigmhfDrU63mVkveWwyypow7LeS4nE6WthiROgWETIGfy+V5 o+P0s4SNauDguP8gUS3iUYvWVBfYw+eHZ4l3emdhdNDfxh5dOKDdPe0cHIywEk2kRfyp 9ofw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=L5UybB58hBc9cWuoHvJw/qluYX8ec9Px7yDFrYD28t8=; b=Zq3FbUxKNcv+aofXHegl1tKolLmcFAZZmuKEajZ/YhGnW3Up+SJkOQDb9WajFUnj3Y urGdxer0EmQ3DroisJC2vA/ahf34pn25ck8et8XXAUFTCbA8CeG80wZKF1TlsgqRWAMU jOzCfLqiy684zh03yygWMPL+b3cLW9zKxugBj3oXHLIm1RQ0I6z/d25LuqadfBrJlrGh HjlM0/zZ/L1RYuuDntQKd1dRA978o20gjfOr420ykZYSPmvRn4suUVbXK1bMcOVWX9Xe le3Nx4yip+pVz8648yjhM+G/4BuQYIDh5aN7enGdqN35l6//Cs6ZcVWYZwAEu8cRGWfA MMsQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g15si1294692eds.159.2020.04.28.02.43.32; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 02:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727841AbgD1JjQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 05:39:16 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:51930 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727834AbgD1JjN (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 05:39:13 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03S9X6uW145751; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 05:38:59 -0400 Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30mguvtba5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 05:38:58 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 03S9TuQG031789; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:38:56 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30mcu5nt1s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:38:56 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 03S9csMZ55443512 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:38:54 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CD642047; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:38:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8009242049; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:38:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srikart450.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.85.87.72]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:38:51 +0000 (GMT) From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Andrew Morton Cc: Srikar Dronamraju , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Christopher Lameter , Michael Ellerman , Linus Torvalds Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/page_alloc: Keep memoryless cpuless node 0 offline Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:08:36 +0530 Message-Id: <20200428093836.27190-4-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200428093836.27190-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20200428093836.27190-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-28_05:2020-04-27,2020-04-28 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=2 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004280082 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Currently Linux kernel with CONFIG_NUMA on a system with multiple possible nodes, marks node 0 as online at boot. However in practice, there are systems which have node 0 as memoryless and cpuless. This can cause numa_balancing to be enabled on systems with only one node with memory and CPUs. The existence of this dummy node which is cpuless and memoryless node can confuse users/scripts looking at output of lscpu / numactl. By marking, N_ONLINE as NODE_MASK_NONE, lets stop assuming that Node 0 is always online. v5.7-rc3 available: 2 nodes (0,2) node 0 cpus: node 0 size: 0 MB node 0 free: 0 MB node 2 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 node 2 size: 32625 MB node 2 free: 31490 MB node distances: node 0 2 0: 10 20 2: 20 10 proc and sys files ------------------ /sys/devices/system/node/online: 0,2 /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing: 1 /sys/devices/system/node/has_cpu: 2 /sys/devices/system/node/has_memory: 2 /sys/devices/system/node/has_normal_memory: 2 /sys/devices/system/node/possible: 0-31 v5.7-rc3 + patch ------------------ available: 1 nodes (2) node 2 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 node 2 size: 32625 MB node 2 free: 31487 MB node distances: node 2 2: 10 proc and sys files ------------------ /sys/devices/system/node/online: 2 /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing: 0 /sys/devices/system/node/has_cpu: 2 /sys/devices/system/node/has_memory: 2 /sys/devices/system/node/has_normal_memory: 2 /sys/devices/system/node/possible: 0-31 Note: On Powerpc, cpu_to_node of possible but not present cpus would previously return 0. Hence this commit depends on commit ("powerpc/numa: Set numa_node for all possible cpus") and commit ("powerpc/numa: Prefer node id queried from vphn"). Without the 2 commits, Powerpc system might crash. Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Christopher Lameter Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju --- Changelog v1:->v2: - Rebased to v5.7-rc3 - Updated the changelog. mm/page_alloc.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 69827d4fa052..03b89592af04 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -116,8 +116,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(latent_entropy); */ nodemask_t node_states[NR_NODE_STATES] __read_mostly = { [N_POSSIBLE] = NODE_MASK_ALL, +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + [N_ONLINE] = NODE_MASK_NONE, +#else [N_ONLINE] = { { [0] = 1UL } }, -#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA [N_NORMAL_MEMORY] = { { [0] = 1UL } }, #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM [N_HIGH_MEMORY] = { { [0] = 1UL } }, -- 2.20.1