Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3948232ybz; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:09:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLLO9YJjeWenPawez67FJKY0KYK1JoTNhsWbQNpn7++lAEFHyCl+8mwVI5o7U82KiWxlH3g X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:804a:: with SMTP id x10mr24868196ejw.86.1588068584177; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:09:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588068584; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=o6YSaHZElh9fdTMBzZ7gHP9Mh03qVFBeaFCP+TlQAFVVht9k/OzoLWlvwTEu9wDLhh ZLkQTjzYatdkJ07cJGevplbZwTOnFPmrxv5c9nkaSAU56IVF0j/vKrSk8KknASdJx9q6 3gqfy4pSwCnfr1wh7YhWDMVmHVKK8BlGFeFXtHJ12OZfaNpww25r3XScEbv78KehpDAh PcJeoxfpXy5aNKbji+GKY5CI14nF4DU1iHt/DBzVcfH/ta6pTepjR2OKSzZCcqQNLP/s /Wp+Go+pgNsRQYJmefFp7lWcqadsp8Eot9UOsZ7QPIbw+P4KJtsyX+V57ULwXbFp1mKy pRlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=o9J+DbLispWr0ggl+aNbsU32DYkcHBetbGBx4TPHlEo=; b=DpZVUe6gTPayIKt5z0S4m0XZx15ztgAUxSnMI8ZVdiz4zKIrUeeK5eI4GsNK3ejoWE 4YadG2kMyaWzc0CYCxMJLPVdtOyvPZQt/teSsg9BtGwBmgLmT8LcdA8LD5P+71+U0GiH 73/KLKBsdY1tMzbU8EsyOAPKLBGQw5k50OE6L177+7NZ8DsEhujH8KR2ECY1OesmEpkM eVqq/+UEnUR63q9rWKit/G8u6hLI+WNaq2Y0h/wUoloNYZEiyvSSz46X1W8HmZzuLNo2 dhTUo+ofOHWpZnEeFO1UThZTnEDfykYNYVpdrfXIxnGRcE0lyXrBTYirnvPC3jo/2qZa KnQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b21si1199114edr.569.2020.04.28.03.09.20; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727771AbgD1KHz (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:07:55 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:48892 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726932AbgD1KHy (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:07:54 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A1A30E; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from C02TD0UTHF1T.local (unknown [10.57.1.132]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBE313F305; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:07:45 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Bhupesh Sharma Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhupesh.linux@gmail.com, Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Frederic Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw_breakpoint: Remove unused '__register_perf_hw_breakpoint' declaration Message-ID: <20200428100745.GA15300@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> References: <1588063937-5744-1-git-send-email-bhsharma@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1588063937-5744-1-git-send-email-bhsharma@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bhupesh, On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 02:22:17PM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > commit b326e9560a28 ("hw-breakpoints: Use overflow handler instead of > the event callback") removed '__register_perf_hw_breakpoint' function > usage and replaced it with 'register_perf_hw_breakpoint' function. > > Remove the left-over unused '__register_perf_hw_breakpoint' declaration > from 'hw_breakpoint.h' as well. > > Cc: Mark Rutland > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma This is generic code, so I'm a bit confused as to why you've sent it to us. I'd expect this to go via the perf core maintainers (cc'd). FWIW, this looks sane to me, so: Acked-by: Mark Rutland Mark. > --- > include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h > index 6058c3844a76..fe1302da8e0f 100644 > --- a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h > +++ b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h > @@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ register_wide_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event_attr *attr, > void *context); > > extern int register_perf_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp); > -extern int __register_perf_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp); > extern void unregister_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp); > extern void unregister_wide_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event * __percpu *cpu_events); > > @@ -115,8 +114,6 @@ register_wide_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event_attr *attr, > void *context) { return NULL; } > static inline int > register_perf_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) { return -ENOSYS; } > -static inline int > -__register_perf_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) { return -ENOSYS; } > static inline void unregister_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) { } > static inline void > unregister_wide_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event * __percpu *cpu_events) { } > -- > 2.7.4 >