Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp4085456ybz; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 05:37:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIKsOhhOiEu2F0MjPA/0mu+zGsSdagHI//8Gl/0Li2FSgGEvGH88yC3FYv2TsLtsgLN+tRO X-Received: by 2002:a50:baa6:: with SMTP id x35mr23145154ede.54.1588077444745; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 05:37:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588077444; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GeiLSR/5XSZJh/q5wRJpRhwmWuHGYZOTNUFu1r2GjOWCpGeQSSmgkFqcFS55rQ5yGG cQp0U/vPqwookHEF3tHhDAQqcjdbnI1ZVH/31hNo0cXxQX94oDqKt0cLFnNejc3+Ts7Z 4ufMoN7NSeCzBYTwRqJ+fmK8jmYbFokqUYQIV1wLsXIw72SRIg/AKEpDKFyGkVTH9aIu h3ETMRCGdsVly5HyTPMZKVdrTjCdyUP8VutAMG7dInnDVvVR7D92wu6eyPe+SxVkGKoZ HGAhXBCnOgcXojnLZKLWwiWQln+Pz42SNPDtVwlqj765anBpVrSz14JsaC7VgVeOYLMq choA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date :references:subject:cc:to:from; bh=OHD6LTwpEw3PcErBehRuTvk/0RcygfzHvbwIp+5Q3n8=; b=FtkFYehjMSUL+HRGpN8+aer2SpcNhFDjOH6DzmHyaBoZTSUMsgxjgcIEBVIpOiaT3I 8/9rOCkBsEpc4DZKx3YXiCI+7CbFQa5Ik7zef+lNBUKJ456zLExHIUGlluE8NlyVDL9H 1E5esIT8ek2J4cHX0CBpoZ4rKk0xTkywyB1a1w/ci7OoYJS6UFaAnymkbT/5ujI1n8PO tdBGnazvq3gl0JiBvxDX4bwPCLcbej+K2+ArOsiPzxqZQ3ktFAX0fT5G9aUfx+enaGrU MGNfn5gtKjO+mgd81MsLbFG06BBR5o4Ltl51wMEQkjS7f9rNibMv5xKbP+rsMwamx67V LpOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jz6si1770732ejb.327.2020.04.28.05.37.01; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 05:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726683AbgD1Mfg (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:35:36 -0400 Received: from albireo.enyo.de ([37.24.231.21]:48354 "EHLO albireo.enyo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726361AbgD1Mff (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:35:35 -0400 Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1jTPSR-0001tQ-I1; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:35:27 +0000 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jTPSR-0008JX-CE; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:35:27 +0200 From: Florian Weimer To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Michael Kerrisk , libc-alpha , carlos , Rich Felker , linux-api , Boqun Feng , Will Deacon , linux-kernel , Peter Zijlstra , Ben Maurer , Dave Watson , Thomas Gleixner , Paul , Paul Turner , Joseph Myers , Szabolcs Nagy Subject: Re: [PATCH glibc 5/9] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup and thread creation (v17) References: <20200326155633.18236-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20200326155633.18236-6-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <87ees9z417.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <284293396.70630.1588005648556.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <87zhawvphv.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <2102127737.70791.1588008377292.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <87ftcnrf7d.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <1080028389.72414.1588077193438.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:35:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1080028389.72414.1588077193438.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (Mathieu Desnoyers's message of "Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:33:13 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <878sifrdo0.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mathieu Desnoyers: > One issue I'm currently facing when running "make check": because > nptl/tst-rseq-nptl.c uses pthread_cancel(), I run into an Abort > with: > > libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work > Didn't expect signal from child: got `Aborted' This is really unusual. Is the affected test statically linked?