Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S277294AbRJVSA6>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:00:58 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S277277AbRJVSAs>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:00:48 -0400
Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:49401
	"EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S277278AbRJVSAa>; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:00:30 -0400
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:00:58 -0700
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Michael T. Babcock" <mbabcock@fibrespeed.net>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VM
Message-ID: <20011022110058.C27227@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Michael T. Babcock" <mbabcock@fibrespeed.net>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <3BD420ED.4090508@fibrespeed.net> <E15vffF-00023N-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E15vffF-00023N-00@the-village.bc.nu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 03:02:49PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I have never done this comparison myself, but I was wondering how ugly 
> > it would be if stable versions of Andrea's and Rik's VMs were both 
> > available in your/Linus' kernel as compile-time options.  Assuming that 
> > each provides better performance under certain conditions, wouldn't 
> 
> Too ugly for words.

Though, if it's done from the start of 2.5, it could be very possible.  Is
there a way to make it non-ugly?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/