Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
        Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.6 110/167] tpm: fix wrong return value in tpm_pcr_extend
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 20:24:46 +0200
Message-Id: <20200428182239.092034139@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200428182225.451225420@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20200428182225.451225420@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

commit 29cb79795e324a8b65e7891d76f8f6ca911ba440 upstream.

For the algorithm that does not match the bank, a positive
value EINVAL is returned here. I think this is a typo error.
It is necessary to return an error value.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4.x
Fixes: 9f75c8224631 ("KEYS: trusted: correctly initialize digests and fix locking issue")
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ int tpm_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip
 
 	for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++) {
 		if (digests[i].alg_id != chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id) {
-			rc = EINVAL;
+			rc = -EINVAL;
 			goto out;
 		}
 	}