Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp4538240ybz; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:11:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKplufCopeONRl5fgb0g8d3GPPrty65Y5rsafu6TJSMDLARBZrwLuh9HjpZiNXytWbniuxa X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c649:: with SMTP id z9mr24839650edr.288.1588104690697; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:11:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588104690; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FBPDCFgAMmQVSFbeBNXiJTnB0Veyhhm+s4QSFFHtrmNBnWXlAwX/MJjQKoy3fZi07P eV7qkcjKY7U7v309sApvujk7fKaMJr5q8KO70PvGheUp0WnedgSV9HelXKsJTvdN4aYF +bZ9XJqUYVTaLQw/9Ue3fBfDPPgaTXTqdZBnWQnIFwy+KSTh6fgBEZ4C+Qnohfwvar5N cm75uBIzGCcRj1PzPCN6yitTGW2anZJzNFMp6ruc3nw9UyUIfWhZoJixeKciiRyYQB5S KypNsjBAgcHJq7AUUL+hQcmHAIH48bjQUh6ZXVsyQY3Fe7IxCqxa48KsuNTKZz2q3PvG JHTg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=0yAku98zCjdF/cDdH70i/MbdoWdGTZLVbzTvyk4yYZs=; b=HoJANEm3cFhr7WYKOMDxW0bnNn65/nk+tbTpo/Uc6mM/FoV1gP7EieHsHdH/G6+1aE JdL/FYSP2YJ3Dg3V0J7CIYg8nELMXxjP1ASofOCKede82zNYwASF01tY1OFkXYYThwb0 wTr8BtbhACVahBKrN30AMC51taR0KkeDYTcwivwbY6CPvv0xkdpFQsRRkx1iqoERPq6Q hyJdpiBHNjArbaw55sE7KYFlBfenPoWFR/wKHmetplEyV5MzX+ylNqS3RbMIS28KO2JY SI6zNDXHihMp5lXWVviJNIOoAafiKHGOBQXtcP+263t3z0ExLPqGVFkYwSNZ3OwKZ2M9 VC6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y1si2393247ejh.219.2020.04.28.13.11.05; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:11:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726380AbgD1UFr (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:05:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58608 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726180AbgD1UFq (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:05:46 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net (shards.monkeyblade.net [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:9]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF73C03C1AB; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f00:477::3d5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB60A1210A3F1; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20200428.130545.1878103691480474686.davem@davemloft.net> To: dmurphy@ti.com Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, afd@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: phy: DP83TC811: Fix WoL in config init to be disabled From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20200427212112.25368-3-dmurphy@ti.com> References: <20200427212112.25368-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200427212112.25368-3-dmurphy@ti.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Dan Murphy Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:21:12 -0500 > + return phy_write_mmd(phydev, DP83822_DEVADDR, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Please don't submit patches that have not even had a conversation with the compiler. This register define only exists in dp83822.c and you are trying to use it in dp83tc811.c If this doesn't compile, how did you do functional testing of this change? If you compile tested these changes against a tree other than the 'net' tree, please don't do that. Thanks.