Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752069AbWCGGxV (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2006 01:53:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751630AbWCGGxV (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2006 01:53:21 -0500 Received: from smtp103.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.213]:31891 "HELO smtp103.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752068AbWCGGxU (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2006 01:53:20 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cpnHUT+Zp2NO9fsdefivsYCDUUqqURbr1eJAmWJEvY/VSgjq0Wf1Mo254O1jMUXm8FrAq1yMiwvDC43Ff4BJNfYc1yubTGE2A2RlhttkPleHgudLu3OigbaEHE4Gvg1UrQZsw5QKh1f7ucaslGD2+4xP6bUZWyh+w9DVdedVfA8= ; Message-ID: <440D2DDA.7040209@yahoo.com.au> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:53:14 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dipankar@in.ibm.com CC: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, fabbione@ubuntu.com, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: VFS nr_files accounting References: <20060305070537.GB21751@in.ibm.com> <20060304.233725.49897411.davem@davemloft.net> <20060305113847.GE21751@in.ibm.com> <20060306.123904.35238417.davem@davemloft.net> <20060307064120.GA5946@in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20060307064120.GA5946@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1142 Lines: 30 Dipankar Sarma wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:39:04PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: >>I think we should seriously consider these patches for 2.6.16 > > > Isn't it a little too late in the 2.6.16 cycle ? I would have > liked a little more time in -mm. Anyway, it is Linus' call. > I can refresh the patches and submit against latest mainline > if Linus and Andrew want. > If it is making the machine unusable then it is a bug rather than just poor behaviour, and definitely a regression. I think this is very good grounds to get into 2.6.16, even if it does mean pushing the release back. The other thing that is typically done for regressions like these close to release time is to revert the offending changes. I figure that in this case, such an option is probably _more_ risky. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/