Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:33:29 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
Message-ID: <20200429083329.30ff39a1@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20200420130118.7a866fd5@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20200420130118.7a866fd5@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/dDJJ.aCsF+jJXjljCKelcwt";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/dDJJ.aCsF+jJXjljCKelcwt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:01:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> =
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>=20
> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c: In function 'controlfb_mmap':
> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c:756:23: error: implicit declaration of fu=
nction 'pgprot_cached_wthru'; did you mean 'pgprot_cached'? [-Werror=3Dimpl=
icit-function-declaration]
>   756 |   vma->vm_page_prot =3D pgprot_cached_wthru(vma->vm_page_prot);
>       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                       pgprot_cached
> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c:756:23: error: incompatible types when as=
signing to type 'pgprot_t' {aka 'struct <anonymous>'} from type 'int'
>=20
> Presumably exposed by commit
>=20
>   a07a63b0e24d ("video: fbdev: controlfb: add COMPILE_TEST support")
>=20
> I just turned off COMPILE_TEST again for today.  Please let me know when
> this is fixed.

This still appears to have not been addressed.

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_/dDJJ.aCsF+jJXjljCKelcwt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl6orzkACgkQAVBC80lX
0Gy4Dgf/bbH2FoAF3e4cOY6NEO6bgilUq/iWrSZpE68n8E4vpUYxj8buZrgeqtnw
EfgJ/oIUvdn7qGotbzGNbolIQYd93tVqDOTuKu6GO9D4zgN8tpg8qATHXRyyD903
L4b8GRVVmPX/xqLvWV7wjYIwGT8IJHockOSl8KDwcZI1b+CR7U4KicnLQ5+GrREJ
0w2iTXn7aTYc6A2mybo+eczofNx9JCWkcDVLpxzkLBSGXmIOyMMWPMMQxgGk7zx3
tvWivMNERFbYLHTkI7u7fm4cF2EH5xtcTHvBfhN/7nw9REymaIfeGSX7HRRaXxO3
ao3ZJJecZA8Crzo0u15bMogPUSwS7A==
=pvTD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/dDJJ.aCsF+jJXjljCKelcwt--