Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <08eafcec5b92626e1ad7906b948419e7300e7684.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@gmail.com>,
        Uwe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:20:47 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wi2bdXuYhC9bd9FShtcf_u-6RUb3Qr_aXq3XtbCxR5NGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200425133504.GA11354@nishad> <20200427155617.GY6749@magnolia>
         <20200427172959.GB3936841@kroah.com>
         <515362d10c06567f35f0d5b7c3f2e121769fb04b.camel@perches.com>
         <20200427174611.GA4035548@kroah.com>
         <791a97d5d4dfd11af533a0bbd6ae27d1a2d479ee.camel@perches.com>
         <20200427183629.GA20158@kroah.com>
         <16b209d0b0c8034db62f8d4d0a260a00f0aa5d5e.camel@perches.com>
         <CAHk-=wgN=Ox112_O=GQ-kwMxYduix9gZFsr1GXXJWLpDpNDm5g@mail.gmail.com>
         <fdcc8aa5a506ba9c6a3e6e68a7147161424985bf.camel@perches.com>
         <CAHk-=wi2bdXuYhC9bd9FShtcf_u-6RUb3Qr_aXq3XtbCxR5NGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.1-2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 13:46 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> There is simply no point in EVER changing "GPL-2.0" into
> "GPL-2.0-only" etc, unless the thing is then touched for some other
> reason (which it may never be).

Which is _exactly_ what is happening here.

But the reason _not_ to touch it here is there would
be a difference between the SPDX license text in the
.c and .h files in the directory.