Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp82614ybz; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:44:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJk1bXohRHLsE25noWWnqwYHAVb9djdu9Szab5zDXLG9bGBjMzxcMv7WKMzQDyTU7+ve7yB X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7204:: with SMTP id m4mr581582ejk.48.1588124646582; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:44:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588124646; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VVVEfEBxHqhQFyS6NKTuGEm9D+6J0YBovmiyBXziBQo3CIpDW+19txXwaWjplDAuei PZvjaqTMyCRzr+e0D0TFjAeBg67aYLY+ENddrXfH6Z+vvYZJrApJA28k4IZV2IUgbCH8 48BBpuH8x8HUqQoXtqY7t0BkfOWqTgRFQqfAYKaGyBsmun4URdm2PaiJthu0gBbN+3sH iAtKCkRoaaf/gUR82nRNgXMFzG/iCrgOSBdJ0m66985mzEAd8ztNFAxuDv67xMPey9yM VirPtTWSSMfPypAXUZy0aMvh7SS1ca4IT/N6QH72u31ccGJopMqdnRBkSIVdCyuATmNP 4ZLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=NrUqc+6/s7yo6yOQjm+ZEBKSiDyevSo7xIw1EMIPVvQ=; b=j9aduUts5lsl8tXVh7mEQLcV8whI8rBuebpE2NTVFvts53Mu1Ze0nG4C26uSoK7BQK mUoT9jIeJ/iU4I59tqNe6KqKtA362w7cGQ519afoz8Vg98qnG/QPu848PPLbNFgVw7bE duMc4HYJ82wmSOcaFDvkQS231qFknBbqFcjyWphSJ9nTzNvrZ/QdczlB4aLIPl/m3sq6 1hC+nARSJbC3+F0uFAuVuXAMYC/C2AHdzgafTOVZy1ViXLRMngGuJ4nX/EPgfC3N/S7k WofUp/1PQkJngxgm7Cu7eS7eYFOESByyPJMwWsbZRuxpY+Y2CYIglDq+7xYy67IfelMv OGVg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a21si2608481edv.500.2020.04.28.18.43.42; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726430AbgD2BmK (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:42:10 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:23544 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726158AbgD2BmK (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:42:10 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03T1XAWm041372; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:41:52 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30mguwkjy8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:41:52 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 03T1eSVM016531; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:41:50 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30mcu6yc7x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:41:50 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 03T1fl4F51708296 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:41:48 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD79911C04C; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:41:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F4A11C04A; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:41:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.vnet.ibm.com (unknown [9.126.150.29]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:41:45 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:11:45 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Andrew Morton Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Christopher Lameter , Michael Ellerman , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/page_alloc: Keep memoryless cpuless node 0 offline Message-ID: <20200429014145.GD19958@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <20200428093836.27190-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200428093836.27190-4-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200428165912.ca1eadefbac56d740e6e8fd1@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200428165912.ca1eadefbac56d740e6e8fd1@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-28_15:2020-04-28,2020-04-28 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004290010 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > By marking, N_ONLINE as NODE_MASK_NONE, lets stop assuming that Node 0 is > > always online. > > > > ... > > > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -116,8 +116,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(latent_entropy); > > */ > > nodemask_t node_states[NR_NODE_STATES] __read_mostly = { > > [N_POSSIBLE] = NODE_MASK_ALL, > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > > + [N_ONLINE] = NODE_MASK_NONE, > > +#else > > [N_ONLINE] = { { [0] = 1UL } }, > > -#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA > > [N_NORMAL_MEMORY] = { { [0] = 1UL } }, > > #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM > > [N_HIGH_MEMORY] = { { [0] = 1UL } }, > > So on all other NUMA machines, when does node 0 get marked online? > > This change means that for some time during boot, such machines will > now be running with node 0 marked as offline. What are the > implications of this? Will something break? Till the nodes are detected, marking Node 0 as online tends to be redundant. Because the system doesn't know if its a NUMA or a non-NUMA system. Once we detect the nodes, we online them immediately. Hence I don't see any side-effects or negative implications of this change. However if I am missing anything, please do let me know. From my part, I have tested this on 1. Non-NUMA Single node but CPUs and memory coming from zero node. 2. Non-NUMA Single node but CPUs and memory coming from non-zero node. 3. NUMA Multi node but with CPUs and memory from node 0. 4. NUMA Multi node but with no CPUs and memory from node 0. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju