Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:17:29 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc:     =?utf-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgUMOpcm9u?= <peron.clem@gmail.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Marcus Cooper <codekipper@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Audio sound card name [was [PATCH 4/7] arm64:
 dts: allwinner: a64: Add HDMI audio]
Message-ID: <20200429081729.qa3gqtl5sof2jhem@gilmour.lan>
References: <20200426120442.11560-1-peron.clem@gmail.com>
 <20200426120442.11560-5-peron.clem@gmail.com>
 <20200428080020.35qcuylwq2ylmubu@gilmour.lan>
 <CAJiuCcc2LQ4L36KSfO8iLVFBUO6k+zsZFX+_Ovm_10PoWO4AsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200428160417.6q5oab2guaumhhwi@gilmour.lan>
 <CAJiuCccFFUJJzXwygLQbDK4fGJ61p72Hv7vj3WVP-=z=J1Yj0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <031ee5d3-8a30-82ee-76db-c0e8a1073046@arm.com>
 <CAGb2v65rRbRpUTdkTF3hd5LnLQQt19YVOyVzM5te5XNVhQQH=A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gt2wxqg5mx7iouyn"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v65rRbRpUTdkTF3hd5LnLQQt19YVOyVzM5te5XNVhQQH=A@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--gt2wxqg5mx7iouyn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 02:24:00PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 1:11 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-04-28 5:49 pm, Cl=E9ment P=E9ron wrote:
> > > Hi Mark, Rob,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 18:04, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:54:00AM +0200, Cl=E9ment P=E9ron wrote:
> > >>> Hi Maxime,
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 10:00, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wro=
te:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 02:04:39PM +0200, Cl=E9ment P=E9ron wrote:
> > >>>>> From: Marcus Cooper <codekipper@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Add a simple-soundcard to link audio between HDMI and I2S.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Marcus Cooper <codekipper@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Cl=E9ment P=E9ron <peron.clem@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> ---
> > >>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 21 ++++++++++++=
+++++++
> > >>>>>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch=
/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > >>>>> index e56e1e3d4b73..08ab6b5e72a5 100644
> > >>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> > >>>>> @@ -102,6 +102,25 @@
> > >>>>>                status =3D "disabled";
> > >>>>>        };
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> +     hdmi_sound: hdmi-sound {
> > >>>>> +             compatible =3D "simple-audio-card";
> > >>>>> +             simple-audio-card,format =3D "i2s";
> > >>>>> +             simple-audio-card,name =3D "allwinner,hdmi";
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'm not sure what the usual card name should be like though. I wou=
ld assume that
> > >>>> this should be something specific enough so that you're able to di=
fferentiate
> > >>>> between boards / SoC so that the userspace can choose a different =
configuration
> > >>>> based on it?
> > >>>
> > >>> I really don't know what we should use here,
> > >>> I just have a look at other SoC:
> > >>> rk3328: "HDMI"
> > >>> rk3399: "hdmi-sound"
> > >>> r8a774c0-cat874: "CAT874 HDMI sound"
> > >>>
> > >>> But maybe it's time to introduce proper name:
> > >>> What about :
> > >>> pat
> > >>> sun50i-h6-hdmi
> > >>
> > >> It's pretty much what we've been using for the other sound cards we =
have, so it
> > >> makes sense to me.
> > >
> > > I have a question regarding the simple-audio-card,name.
> > > In this patch, I would like to introduce a simple-audio-card for the
> > > Allwinner A64 HDMI.
> > >
> > > What should be the preferred name for this sound card?
> > > "sun50i-a64-hdmi" ? "allwinner, sun50i-a64-hdmi" ?
> >
> > I can at least speak for RK3328, and the reasoning there was that as the
> > user looking at what `aplay -l` says, I don't give a hoot about what the
> > SoC may be called, I see two cards and I want to know, with the least
> > amount of uncertainty, which one will make the sound come out of the
> > port that's labelled "HDMI" on the box ;)
>=20
> I agree. The user really doesn't care what SoC the system uses. The only
> real requirement is to be able to tell which output the card is related
> to, i.e. is it onboard or an external DAC, is it analog or HDMI, etc..

Yeah, but it's exactly the point.

If we also end up with "HDMI" as our card name, then the userspace has no w=
ay to
tell anymore if it's running from an rk3328 or an allwinner SoC, or somethi=
ng
else entirely. And therefore it cannot really configure anything to work ou=
t of
the box anymore.

Maxime

--gt2wxqg5mx7iouyn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCXqk4GQAKCRDj7w1vZxhR
xdYuAQCSWAhkZ+elqEcbpxFkCF5lqsPWcmn8x+bXetvScA7cMgEAqsSiFvNk9/P6
g63BaHgYF/RoI8GqAS53kmmdYLmT1gs=
=tWdH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gt2wxqg5mx7iouyn--