Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200428212752.2901778-1-arnd@arndb.de> <6b39fbba-c65d-2c02-14bf-11c2d00547af@linux.intel.com>
 <CAK8P3a24whg2RhJE3Vf5u3EWy+wvFqhXdp7EQZuQx0shPsMARw@mail.gmail.com>
 <f91c9a68-7641-beb8-a23e-bd1b9b8d0acb@linux.intel.com> <b784c008-7094-05cb-6200-6b246ff39bb8@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <b784c008-7094-05cb-6200-6b246ff39bb8@linux.intel.com>
From:   Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:21:35 +0300
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZCr0NAfx4UGcd3v6Cr5bZpUmQg5VCG9OA=aj=4uJX0qOg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: sort out Kconfig, again
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Arnd, Pierre,

Thanks for looking at this.

> >>> Thanks Arnd, do you mind sharing your config?
> >>
> >> https://pastebin.com/HRX5xi3R
> >
> > will give it a try, thanks!
> >
> >>> We noticed last week that
> >>> there's a depend/select confusion might be simpler to fix, see
> >>> https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/2047/commits
> >>>
> >>> If I look at the first line I see a IMX_DSP=n which looks exactly like
> >>> what we wanted to fix.
> >>
> >> Yes, I think that fix addresses the build warning as well, but looking
> >> more closely I don't think it's what you want: If you do this on
> >> a config that has the IMX_DSP disabled, it would appear to the
> >> user that you have enabled the drivers, but the actual code is still
> >> disabled.
> >
> > Are you sure? we added a select IMX_DSP, so not sure how it can be
> > disabled?
>
> I just tested Arnd's config with the patch we came up with for SOF
> (attached) and it makes the unmet dependency go away and builds fine.
> the problem is really using select IMX_DSP if it can be disabled by
> something else. My proposal looks simpler but I will agree it's not
> necessarily super elegant to move the dependency on IMX_BOX into SOF, so
> no sustained objection from me on Arnd's proposal.
>
> Daniel, this is your part of SOF, please chime in.

I would go in favor of Arnd's patch as it gets rid of exposing
IMX_MBOX into SOF.
The code will be fine even IMX_DSP=n, because the exported functions
used by SOF have dummy implementations in case IMX_DSP is not selected.

One concern is that we could end up in a case where IMX_DSP={y|m} but
IMX_MBOX=n.

Technically this is not possible because IMX_DSP depends on IMX_MBOX. So,
one cannot generate such a .config file from menuconfig interface.

You can add my:

Acked-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>