Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: manage all errors
 cases at probe time
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
CC:     <richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <tony@atomide.com>,
        <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
References: <1586966256-29548-1-git-send-email-christophe.kerello@st.com>
 <1586966256-29548-5-git-send-email-christophe.kerello@st.com>
 <20200427194747.224a2402@xps13>
 <40a9bac7-9ed4-b781-f2c2-2d90b4e82749@denx.de>
 <20200427200848.722f4c56@xps13>
 <3527f3b8-225d-6e5a-dd8a-0421d475f70b@denx.de>
 <20200427220806.13741ec0@xps13>
From:   Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@st.com>
Message-ID: <75a430de-54af-c4db-9d93-6b3d5e65874c@st.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:07:06 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200427220806.13741ec0@xps13>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Miquèl,

On 4/27/20 10:08 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
[...]
>>>> btw would it make sense to split the first three patches of this series
>>>> into a separate series ? This rawnand part seems more like an unrelated
>>>> cleanup.
>>> As it seems that the MFD discussion can take longer, then I would say
>>> yes, at least for the cleanup/misc changes part.
>> Right
>>

I think that it is better to only have one set of patches as there is 
different maintainers that will review the whole set of patches.
I expect to be able to propose a v3 next week to add the EBI driver and 
the updates on NAND driver (as some patches are linked)
A proposal could be to put all the NAND patches that you have started to 
review at the beginning of the set of patches (patch 4/5/6/7/8).
You will be free to apply them after the review and I will only resubmit 
the patches that have not been applied in the next version.

Regards,
Christophe Kerello.