Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200320093125.23092-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <CACRpkdZgWUwmmuXn12DS3TsQS0yQxcweqK6HGxBm=V_2LBLBMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMpxmJUb09KGreHw6Bdz79rbnQE7oZnWg_5qN_FhzoS2-XccFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75Vdpb=hNiR3c7G_yTeSt70Vcy3DWHin0B5+WYV1hbRMBJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMpxmJVT4wm26hQB-_BV73tC5_nqH5JG9KmDuNQ2OJe+tE+gLg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMpxmJVT4wm26hQB-_BV73tC5_nqH5JG9KmDuNQ2OJe+tE+gLg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:37:50 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeGQzXfzzRR2EM5zwb8EfiyxAOJFqQuAFH-C2zdNAGjYw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: don't call sleeping functions with a spinlock taken
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 9:40 AM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> wrote:
> wt., 28 kwi 2020 o 17:53 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> napi=
sa=C5=82(a):
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 6:35 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
> > <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> wrote:
> > > wt., 14 kwi 2020 o 14:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> nap=
isa=C5=82(a):
> > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:31 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl=
> wrote:

...

> > It looks like we need a mutex less function which can be used here and
> > in the call you are considering racy.
>
> The thing is this mutex is in pinctrl - we'd need to export it too so
> that gpio can use it.

Oh, I see now. So, something like

pinctrl_ext_operation_begin()
....
pinctrl_ext_operation_end()

perhaps.

--=20
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko