Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp687960ybz; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK3J/+n9N1wChlz2Le1YwXOZ39EMZgBbu7vWx+qad2wg1Ym2S4hAFIzVAeWxO7tlkgeoTb+ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:552:: with SMTP id i18mr2710218edx.378.1588171261393; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588171261; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bMbNoDJCzeSn9nT76Zu7w5BoGNUIkSd58AZjX1KOMUivpCS8+7KwKyLdbGPI7WyY4n 1BzMaXAF5U/hnkAcstgAR6BqONXqrzVBrmToER2lWEAtLvrQ89PATNrD8pMnm1UZGzPK Fzwb+24ilaFIisBn5jRCHmC6qRYJmR7n3bdvRWHq2lKRpgasJ4xwF+k+4fw9O5T9XOgV XYEqV1ZfdE5S1dN5uUvQJef1YJw0rDsFUnS9lmNcUGyZCYyjpdcsA+G4EZfOH6VkIeLr /2JDB1mXn57OlsTCHFwJ23YxBSA+TdQ5XB2wiVGBkqmLQ5pHylOAI0Q7rFLR+G2ziS16 fAmg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject:dkim-signature; bh=EYGBSDm1wv06sHxoVMD8B6GSZnWRBOWdfk0lRWRXmPU=; b=AdQQgvnmD4EQKv0DH9zFyqk/5guoMVW0M4hixS1ETjv7ZxGj3qgo1I1EYKuu2owxDv /TDffp0753pchcYIdk8krWi/X8/1kqHM45v8JYXy4ZV1msq2EVIPXEX9qnKaDoG7Aicp I8qpMgpf84nyA+/9g5v2yfwAIbLvC2kpnP38iuMZOaFUKxmL6HvQSUt01SN0KNL2PiAX ipbm3so6f2p7sDzDj7gQHvKLgBcqoITmAOIqggTGYCHVg4HPSdkjpoTPJVnJD+xykLzI PPsCachx7B2vwHsdNNvivZS2Lj0ezjUL/bFWM8wnRLSR06/OKQ/A4/RhUgK7QiQXnuv5 1eMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@st.com header.s=STMicroelectronics header.b=Q3cXQ8bV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=st.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d1si1079120ejh.165.2020.04.29.07.40.37; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@st.com header.s=STMicroelectronics header.b=Q3cXQ8bV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=st.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726847AbgD2OjF (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:39:05 -0400 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:50379 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726451AbgD2OjE (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:39:04 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046037.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03TEcUx7020853; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:38:57 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=st.com; h=subject : from : to : cc : references : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=STMicroelectronics; bh=EYGBSDm1wv06sHxoVMD8B6GSZnWRBOWdfk0lRWRXmPU=; b=Q3cXQ8bVyNKrHQy/+NQw8/d4OHm1jnHAJMe7H+BuH2WkxcjWcD+b7b1495MqG//c9Jib LwnNGzPTdv98EPQYrUpKjGK1TBmpcJYMGUwrFnOI8j8bWNyqL7YiBlW49l3XwrjLYXmQ eweMF+Fkli/LzmJHtK2zWRiopY9lvTuE2+qvAbwOzhNLN6wx1cxuPSe36nkyX9cX9XN4 FcghqJpH5sNYllnm5zArZvfgkJIx7uKXv1pB9VkrmszQ7XdFLeMkelS2cO/dng7fbXIt Og/GVY76QJfVX6hQHxxHFUElgT/nc4W6NMPHbCXooWIvwK92mAhr+A6b2sAricxKNv8d GQ== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30mhcc6xak-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:38:57 +0200 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id AE4D810002A; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:38:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag3node1.st.com [10.75.127.7]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 97ABF222CEF; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:38:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lmecxl0889.tpe.st.com (10.75.127.44) by SFHDAG3NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:38:55 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] remoteproc: Introducing function rproc_set_state_machine() From: Arnaud POULIQUEN To: Mathieu Poirier , , CC: , , , , , References: <20200424200135.28825-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> <20200424200135.28825-13-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Message-ID: <1438e3f6-3d8a-7edd-f552-b01f84316ec7@st.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:38:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.44] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG7NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.19) To SFHDAG3NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.7) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-29_07:2020-04-29,2020-04-29 signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/29/20 11:22 AM, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > > > On 4/24/20 10:01 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: >> Introducting function rproc_set_state_machine() to add >> operations and a set of flags to use when synchronising with >> a remote processor. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier >> --- >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 6 +++ >> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 3 ++ >> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> index 48afa1f80a8f..5c48714e8702 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> @@ -2065,6 +2065,59 @@ int devm_rproc_add(struct device *dev, struct rproc *rproc) >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_rproc_add); >> >> +/** >> + * rproc_set_state_machine() - Set a synchronisation ops and set of flags >> + * to use with a remote processor >> + * @rproc: The remote processor to work with >> + * @sync_ops: The operations to use when synchronising with a remote >> + * processor >> + * @sync_flags: The flags to use when deciding if the remoteproc core >> + * should be synchronising with a remote processor >> + * >> + * Returns 0 on success, an error code otherwise. >> + */ >> +int rproc_set_state_machine(struct rproc *rproc, >> + const struct rproc_ops *sync_ops, >> + struct rproc_sync_flags sync_flags) > > So this API should be called by platform driver only in case of synchronization > support, right? > In this case i would rename it as there is also a state machine in "normal" boot > proposal: rproc_set_sync_machine or rproc_set_sync_state_machine > Reviewing the stm32 series, i wonder if sync_flags should be a pointer to a const structure as the platform driver should not update it during the rproc live cycle. Then IMO, using a pointer to the structure instead of the structure seems more in line with the rest of the remoteproc API. >> +{ >> + if (!rproc || !sync_ops) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + /* >> + * No point in going further if we never have to synchronise with >> + * the remote processor. >> + */ >> + if (!sync_flags.on_init && >> + !sync_flags.after_stop && !sync_flags.after_crash) >> + return 0; >> + >> + /* >> + * Refuse to go further if remoteproc operations have been allocated >> + * but they will never be used. >> + */ >> + if (rproc->ops && sync_flags.on_init && >> + sync_flags.after_stop && sync_flags.after_crash) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + /* >> + * Don't allow users to set this more than once to avoid situations >> + * where the remote processor can't be recovered. >> + */ >> + if (rproc->sync_ops) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + rproc->sync_ops = kmemdup(sync_ops, sizeof(*sync_ops), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!rproc->sync_ops) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + rproc->sync_flags = sync_flags; >> + /* Tell the core what to do when initialising */ >> + rproc_set_sync_flag(rproc, RPROC_SYNC_STATE_INIT); > > Is there a use case where sync_flags.on_init is false and other flags are true? > > Look like on_init is useless and should not be exposed to the platform driver. > Or comments are missing to explain the usage of it vs the other flags. > > Regards, > Arnaud > >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_set_state_machine); >> + >> /** >> * rproc_type_release() - release a remote processor instance >> * @dev: the rproc's device >> @@ -2088,6 +2141,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev) >> kfree_const(rproc->firmware); >> kfree_const(rproc->name); >> kfree(rproc->ops); >> + kfree(rproc->sync_ops); >> kfree(rproc); >> } >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h >> index 7dcc0a26892b..c1a293a37c78 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h >> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace { >> /* >> * enum rproc_sync_states - remote processsor sync states >> * >> + * @RPROC_SYNC_STATE_INIT state to use when the remoteproc core >> + * is initialising. >> * @RPROC_SYNC_STATE_SHUTDOWN state to use after the remoteproc core >> * has shutdown (rproc_shutdown()) the >> * remote processor. >> @@ -39,6 +41,7 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace { >> * operation to use. >> */ >> enum rproc_sync_states { >> + RPROC_SYNC_STATE_INIT, >> RPROC_SYNC_STATE_SHUTDOWN, >> RPROC_SYNC_STATE_CRASHED, >> }; >> @@ -47,6 +50,9 @@ static inline void rproc_set_sync_flag(struct rproc *rproc, >> enum rproc_sync_states state) >> { >> switch (state) { >> + case RPROC_SYNC_STATE_INIT: >> + rproc->sync_with_rproc = rproc->sync_flags.on_init; >> + break; >> case RPROC_SYNC_STATE_SHUTDOWN: >> rproc->sync_with_rproc = rproc->sync_flags.after_stop; >> break; >> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> index ceb3b2bba824..a75ed92b3de6 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> @@ -619,6 +619,9 @@ struct rproc *rproc_get_by_child(struct device *dev); >> struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name, >> const struct rproc_ops *ops, >> const char *firmware, int len); >> +int rproc_set_state_machine(struct rproc *rproc, >> + const struct rproc_ops *sync_ops, >> + struct rproc_sync_flags sync_flags); >> void rproc_put(struct rproc *rproc); >> int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc); >> int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc); >>