Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] remoteproc: stm32: Add support for synchronising
 with M4
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>,
        <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
CC:     <loic.pallardy@st.com>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20200424202505.29562-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
From:   Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
Message-ID: <219771d3-b0a5-0ec7-7f20-d2055bcb0217@st.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:08:32 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200424202505.29562-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mathieu,

On 4/24/20 10:24 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> This patchset needs to be applied on top of this one [1].
> 
> It refactors the STM32 platform code in order to introduce support for
> synchronising with the M4 remote processor that would have been started by
> the boot loader or another entity.
> 
> It carries the same functionatlity as the previeous revision but account
> for changes in the remoteproc core to support synchronisation scenarios.
> Some RB tags have been removed when the content of the patch has strayed 
> too far from the original version. See patch 3, 8, 9 and 12 for more
> details.

I reviewed the series, and made some tests on my side.
FYI, I do not answer to patches when tagged "Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy" 
and with no extra remark. So consider them as Reviewed-by me but not
necessary to add the tag in commit, Reviewed-by: loic in commit is sufficient. 

Concerning tests, it works find except the crash recovery from a sync start.
But i suppose that you know the limitation, waiting Loic patches[1] update :)

[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/11/403

Thanks a lot for your work!
Arnaud
 

> 
> Tested on ST's mp157c board.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
> 
> [1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=277049
> [2]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=239877
> 
> Mathieu Poirier (12):
>   remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from memory translation
>   remoteproc: stm32: Request IRQ with platform device
>   remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from DT parsing
>   remoteproc: stm32: Remove memory translation from DT parsing
>   remoteproc: stm32: Parse syscon that will manage M4 synchronisation
>   remoteproc: stm32: Get coprocessor state
>   remoteproc: stm32: Get loaded resource table for synchronisation
>   remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new start ops for synchronisation
>   remoteproc: stm32: Update M4 state in stm32_rproc_stop()
>   remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new parse fw ops for synchronisation
>   remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new loaded rsc ops for synchronisation
>   remoteproc: stm32: Set synchronisation state machine if needed
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 262 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 244 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>