Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:28:55 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>
Cc:     linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        shuah@kernel.org, colin.king@canonical.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
        yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: treat module requirement unmet
 situation as unsupported
Message-ID: <20200429122855.02594f33@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20200429095044.24625-1-po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>
References: <20200429095044.24625-1-po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:50:44 +0800
Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@canonical.com> wrote:

> When the required module for the test does not exist, use
> exit_unsupported instead of exit_unresolved to indicate this test is
> not supported.
> 
> By doing this we can make test behaviour in sync with the
> irqsoff_tracer.tc test in preemptirq, which is also treating module
> existence in this way. Moreover, the test won't exit with a non-zero
> return value if the module does not exist.
> 
> Fixes: 646f01ccdd59 ("ftrace/selftest: Add tests to test register_ftrace_direct()")
> Fixes: 4d23e9b4fd2e ("selftests/ftrace: Add trace_printk sample module test")
> Fixes: 7bc026d6c032 ("selftests/ftrace: Add function filter on module testcase")
> Fixes: af2a0750f374 ("selftests/ftrace: Improve kprobe on module testcase to load/unload module")

I don't think this deserves the Fixes tags.

> Signed-off-by: Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct/ftrace-direct.tc  | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct/kprobe-direct.tc  | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/trace_printk.tc    | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_mod_trace.tc | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_module.tc  | 2 +-

I'm fine with these changes if Masami is. But it is Masami's call as his
infrastructure is more sensitive to the return calls than mine. I just run
the test and see what passes. I don't actually look at the return codes.

-- Steve


>  5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct/ftrace-direct.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct/ftrace-direct.tc
> index d75a869..3d6189e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct/ftrace-direct.tc
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct/ftrace-direct.tc
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>  rmmod ftrace-direct ||:
>  if ! modprobe ftrace-direct ; then
>    echo "No ftrace-direct sample module - please make CONFIG_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT=m"
> -  exit_unresolved;
> +  exit_unsupported;
>  fi
>  
>  echo "Let the module run a little"
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct/kprobe-direct.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct/kprobe-direct.tc
> index 801ecb6..3d0e3ca 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct/kprobe-direct.tc
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/direct/kprobe-direct.tc
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>  rmmod ftrace-direct ||:
>  if ! modprobe ftrace-direct ; then
>    echo "No ftrace-direct sample module - please build with CONFIG_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT=m"
> -  exit_unresolved;
> +  exit_unsupported;
>  fi
>  
>  if [ ! -f kprobe_events ]; then
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/trace_printk.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/trace_printk.tc
> index b02550b..dd8b10d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/trace_printk.tc
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/trace_printk.tc
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>  rmmod trace-printk ||:
>  if ! modprobe trace-printk ; then
>    echo "No trace-printk sample module - please make CONFIG_SAMPLE_TRACE_PRINTK=m"
> -  exit_unresolved;
> +  exit_unsupported;
>  fi
>  
>  echo "Waiting for irq work"
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_mod_trace.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_mod_trace.tc
> index 1a4b4a4..26dc06a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_mod_trace.tc
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_mod_trace.tc
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ echo '*:mod:trace_printk' > set_ftrace_filter
>  if ! modprobe trace-printk ; then
>    echo "No trace-printk sample module - please make CONFIG_SAMPLE_TRACE_PRINTK=
>  m"
> -  exit_unresolved;
> +  exit_unsupported;
>  fi
>  
>  : "Wildcard should be resolved after loading module"
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_module.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_module.tc
> index d861bd7..4e07c69 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_module.tc
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_module.tc
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ rmmod trace-printk ||:
>  if ! modprobe trace-printk ; then
>    echo "No trace-printk sample module - please make CONFIG_SAMPLE_TRACE_PRINTK=
>  m"
> -  exit_unresolved;
> +  exit_unsupported;
>  fi
>  
>  MOD=trace_printk