Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 18:46:07 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
cc:     jpoimboe@redhat.com, alexandre.chartre@oracle.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jthierry@redhat.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] objtool vs retpoline
In-Reply-To: <20200428191101.886208539@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2004291843270.3662@pobox.suse.cz>
References: <20200428191101.886208539@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Based on Alexandre's patches, here's a few that go on top of tip/objtool/core.
> 
> With these patches on objtool can completely understand retpolines and RSB
> stuffing, which means it can emit valid ORC unwind information for them, which
> in turn means we can now unwind through a retpoline.
> 
> New since last time:
> 
>  - 1-3, alternatives vs ORC unwind
>  - 7-9: implement some suggestions from Julien
>  - addressed feedback

You can add my

Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>

to patches 1A, 1B and 2-10 (objtool patches and updated smap fix). The 
other four patches should be fine too, but I am not well versed in the 
speculation stuff.

Miroslav