Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp953033ybz; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:19:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIhOYV1C4xhLlgF/rTf97KAQzAZogu3i86pORz3Ds48kS036Cqw4WtwIscIR7R2iGJHpMRi X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1199:: with SMTP id uz25mr4036199ejb.131.1588187954052; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:19:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588187954; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jwsDyywwdlYakbzCU6axZQ8c7d5QvQNBHzMf639P+/A24F5gzYwDJ7IkloFgfQ/854 qRJBECgQ+j4FqD1K0tEKKOTSIOBdrF0GRF0DxYMJ1boST8o1R0Fzdrk7ZxuKyxFu/CRU 2vDeOpDKiOItEgpqaR26iWy6r+PUBqzotbC5w3v0MrbX5EfngGQOr1c1ebk2B1d20OJb PuvraE6QDWp9QJe+xWnGLhsHN1SAjcZrYve2DihYegHk3lX3yLg6JHKxjgWquh0nGqHj E4xldMm7lWnQnWHjlRbiDox/ZpPLO/m9lKbDd7qv4QZffreI1qy72Xl1wQ1d3SnVbfLC GcbQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=csScdgeHi2t9ckn1HTInsakC9n3F1IMooBogSHeXnKA=; b=tZQH60xZdSnV/4XpCO77Chz90TKdUoHylXf7D/wpB1GHVZFt27vgYwowZv/bcfh/xA jbbDd7qht8bk4cJBoyupACN3Fh6XY46WypyVPyM6nA7QMGNhur8KibeXVXOSlyDu70Jh KUgp1m22CU05Of5ce4LLr8GKRvQ2FrI8W3igPE5jNefZQgPg2u/Al6kG/X1FKwcjj/nE bxNIZlX+G2PA8qzGym5BhQQAIKwCNxCPrtZVBBd2V0vGf1XzK5H5kF6F5TqAPIU/t+4o mUj3pHzotLFzqbcelshFqx/LkqKTPXlXZ4dbqy0bJiR4FP60afDql4MnPsFwz142jqcM /Kgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v12si3890176edy.201.2020.04.29.12.18.49; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727791AbgD2TRL (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:17:11 -0400 Received: from correo.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:36326 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726743AbgD2TRL (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:17:11 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66227D2DA2A for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:17:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B7AB7FF5 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:17:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix, from userid 99) id 475F7B7FF1; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:17:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on antivirus1-rhel7.int X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.2 required=7.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, SMTPAUTH_US2,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAE8DA736; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:17:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.97 (192.168.1.97) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:17:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int) Received: from us.es (unknown [90.77.255.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 1984lsi) by entrada.int (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 290E042EF9E2; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:17:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:17:07 +0200 X-SMTPAUTHUS: auth mail.us.es From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik , Florian Westphal , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_osf: avoid passing pointer to local var Message-ID: <20200429191707.GA16859@salvia> References: <20200429190051.27993-1-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200429190051.27993-1-arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 09:00:41PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > gcc-10 points out that a code path exists where a pointer to a stack > variable may be passed back to the caller: > > net/netfilter/nfnetlink_osf.c: In function 'nf_osf_hdr_ctx_init': > cc1: warning: function may return address of local variable [-Wreturn-local-addr] > net/netfilter/nfnetlink_osf.c:171:16: note: declared here > 171 | struct tcphdr _tcph; > | ^~~~~ > > I am not sure whether this can happen in practice, but moving the > variable declaration into the callers avoids the problem. Applied, thanks.