Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200429174120.1497212-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
 <20200429174120.1497212-5-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> <f74fe4ad56c0471f863ce550869391c8811f9893.camel@perches.com>
 <CAMj1kXGn70BmapKe=6sA17gMCcWRLCebQJFnyObwRbAefOcEng@mail.gmail.com> <20200429214332.GC1621173@rani.riverdale.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20200429214332.GC1621173@rani.riverdale.lan>
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 23:45:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXEwvtQoWj2GjMzLY+wnaMu9cUP8jRpwuQBC0fpEy31r_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] efi/x86: Use pr_efi_err for error messages
To:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 23:43, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:49:21PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 20:47, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 13:41 -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > > > Use pr_efi_err instead of bare efi_printk for error messages.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it'd be better to rename pr_efi_err to eri_err
> > > to it's clearer it's a typical efi_ logging function.
> > >
> > > $ git grep -w --name-only pr_efi_err | \
> > >   xargs sed -i 's/\bpr_efi_err\b/efi_err/g'
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, pr_efi_err() is probably not the best name
>
> Should I rename pr_efi/pr_efi_err to, say, efi_pr_info/efi_pr_error?

If you don't mind spinning another couple of patches, yes, that would
be helpful.

Let's use efi_pr_info and efi_pr_err to stay aligned with the ordinary
counterparts