Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <31b23951ee2b8e2391f3208b60a7132df18be74e.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] efi/x86: Use pr_efi_err for error messages
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:53:07 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20200429214332.GC1621173@rani.riverdale.lan>
References: <20200429174120.1497212-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
         <20200429174120.1497212-5-nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
         <f74fe4ad56c0471f863ce550869391c8811f9893.camel@perches.com>
         <CAMj1kXGn70BmapKe=6sA17gMCcWRLCebQJFnyObwRbAefOcEng@mail.gmail.com>
         <20200429214332.GC1621173@rani.riverdale.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.1-2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 17:43 -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:49:21PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 20:47, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 13:41 -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > > > Use pr_efi_err instead of bare efi_printk for error messages.
> > > 
> > > Perhaps it'd be better to rename pr_efi_err to eri_err
> > > so it's clearer it's a typical efi_ logging function.
> > > 
> > > $ git grep -w --name-only pr_efi_err | \
> > >   xargs sed -i 's/\bpr_efi_err\b/efi_err/g'
> > > 
> > 
> > Yeah, pr_efi_err() is probably not the best name
> 
> Should I rename pr_efi/pr_efi_err to, say, efi_pr_info/efi_pr_error?

Perhaps not use pr_ in the name at all.

I suggest:

pr_efi		-> efi_info (or efi_debug or efi_dbg)
		   (it is guarded by an efi_quiet flag, default: on)
pr_efi_err	-> efi_err