Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp1093202ybz; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:58:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI0KYP7jO8xgeheDd3Q7PtEwpurYt6c1c9eajySyYtgL9lwA4mDootLypLrQpp2zpZ2tiW2 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d504:: with SMTP id y4mr50764edq.295.1588197483298; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:58:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588197483; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=D7IM5TYWd/J3TGfbmKuvCOXoyufrtCWc5hm5cbicTxXoUnOA4NoZL41JfmvxTpGw0f i/NVXuKP7vwWe+I3VH7X1vw7n5TjxdGYSXJoLkvQ3pmA7SVq1Hvh4/e6ibH6uxAGVbzN J2rx8Y+vpYy7GycFA5GOk0HZ2tr+QjFAk3Cx0FtpYQnrGcyodYQ+XUTmVnWQ8DG80Y0Y lhx5tsXKsCkH1XRn40d+yjvclXchaPjH3XDhwniMojvK9eAna5QBhFgyu+zmtLXeKnzO tqS5nk50xyARG7fsyZrUyfeWNKXES2VMH4+Ehloi1N+JfK6sRAEihoMT7NQbwrdb3vou joFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=2QGyuQ2tug05v71Damp4+Rb2oOTqBdOGYFM4CsVct7g=; b=ZsBVpS/JmjgEKkQgqRJX1XIiV7ztrdWDBIyg4iy8+PnDv+GfpUmXpXwxueAiugn9mq hJBAjAHCtv88s2m4NVGmaNISkCzD4T9FtNpBoTIw510D+M6TwPtpIN127FX65kXC6Iij 8NGGE6ckhtMxbkdSzIoEbdmFah7xFQXVugBU25pGMJ+U69QkBdchde19zFY8ZRDjdYE3 PS+v8MjnhLQwab3tNvJyvwB96qR8yueQN2H14svJYASWXCjC5Fv3LqLmmnzMiDUU6Kj2 T2vVQ7kbBUA9vJNkp0j/kZMlDakU/p2jAN6LbKqG+oHVLc6G1ZkFkb0328W21RmsSWVj klEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=KAx2y1B4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a17si4775535edb.590.2020.04.29.14.57.39; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=KAx2y1B4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728099AbgD2VzR (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:55:17 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45952 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726554AbgD2VzQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:55:16 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f51.google.com (mail-io1-f51.google.com [209.85.166.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5121020B1F; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:55:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588197316; bh=vewqOcHFnU47ZJ5WNNQy7fqQ0TcKyqwkwZMTG3+vyhc=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=KAx2y1B42AP9M4XQw3RqJaR9BwgRY3SneHaE2rbaSTXnJr5GM23JOgOGMOqObwHPa 6TqyRM/D6WzYbASRcZjuC5r3tKYMc1CP/9qijqELGStK3CAA4PfwrN5Agd04J6Spo8 HbsOnlt8FV0umJICUw1wAm6eT+ZAEYqURhOh4/ao= Received: by mail-io1-f51.google.com with SMTP id w4so3954396ioc.6; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:55:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYmEq7zUY0scsP74DOvM7xnvllXykgf9TYi31RUUyg4dorLpLfY txrLewQPlay22/AnLt6WLtVFZTGWaCo/tlla53c= X-Received: by 2002:a02:969a:: with SMTP id w26mr142960jai.71.1588197315770; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:55:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200429174120.1497212-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> <20200429174120.1497212-5-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> <20200429214332.GC1621173@rani.riverdale.lan> <31b23951ee2b8e2391f3208b60a7132df18be74e.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: <31b23951ee2b8e2391f3208b60a7132df18be74e.camel@perches.com> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 23:55:04 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] efi/x86: Use pr_efi_err for error messages To: Joe Perches Cc: Arvind Sankar , linux-efi , X86 ML , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 23:53, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 17:43 -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:49:21PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 20:47, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 13:41 -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote: > > > > > Use pr_efi_err instead of bare efi_printk for error messages. > > > > > > > > Perhaps it'd be better to rename pr_efi_err to eri_err > > > > so it's clearer it's a typical efi_ logging function. > > > > > > > > $ git grep -w --name-only pr_efi_err | \ > > > > xargs sed -i 's/\bpr_efi_err\b/efi_err/g' > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, pr_efi_err() is probably not the best name > > > > Should I rename pr_efi/pr_efi_err to, say, efi_pr_info/efi_pr_error? > > Perhaps not use pr_ in the name at all. > > I suggest: > > pr_efi -> efi_info (or efi_debug or efi_dbg) > (it is guarded by an efi_quiet flag, default: on) > pr_efi_err -> efi_err > Agreed. Shorter is better if there is no risk of confusion..