Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 22:04:38 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>
Cc:     linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        shuah <shuah@kernel.org>, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: treat module requirement unmet
 situation as unsupported
Message-ID: <20200429220438.3a7bbc17@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <CAMy_GT88BD6Ty9=gtqhsm2UPf8aX-=SHZrWj_-UZJONnk73+nQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200429095044.24625-1-po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>
        <20200429122855.02594f33@gandalf.local.home>
        <CAMy_GT88BD6Ty9=gtqhsm2UPf8aX-=SHZrWj_-UZJONnk73+nQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:46:36 +0800
Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@canonical.com> wrote:

> > I'm fine with these changes if Masami is. But it is Masami's call as his
> > infrastructure is more sensitive to the return calls than mine. I just run
> > the test and see what passes. I don't actually look at the return codes.  
> Another thing to note is that this will also change the "# of
> unresolved" and "# of unsupported" in the summary at the end of the
> test report.

Understood. In my testing, I have all the modules enabled so I don't worry
about it ;-)

-- Steve