Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp1976760ybz; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:42:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJNMGTB46nb6n1LRtLCNliL852G4zlb9SasYjgkMTNyELniqUaZzPTQEyLhFrCUn7f558ee X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7f0c:: with SMTP id d12mr3199890ejr.40.1588261364135; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:42:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588261364; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WiZdJXB2smygWb/WFHDrBMwfB0VWvCMv9ChFqLgvSP6+GZY82ocEnqiaml5yxERqVX gtoJLTJGhB1xiQkFP0vMlrouh5WEQmwNS9TmFtiUwqNM6xhVbRWcl+oe4RKcElT5VwON IStjp1GbUJ1FDDKHFHNTil8QJ1+/m30kLikoejzsqYX6duO/DtAp71tg/3U5QnVg/fG4 JFJkd1+QCVhvi++Jvv5tKHdoftQA4w6M8d98FozysKTW6blg+OqLandoTJKi+IgdNWjq tW/3qJSjmh9zZPU/fumkvrgajtFT0rVIx3AmTkjs/Zfq0YJRDiJGBX6qxV1+s5xqL944 q4gQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=P9HhjXHjgQ2uRdTOdCGFRzrISVJUe9hHihb1s6U+pG0=; b=ZRCi0izUlVObRPWAdu1K1W2sj+1gRZ57wSnNDuzNLyA4khkeUNej552eFlkQ1xgX/u M8sCeDi7C1eiTK0YoGRIEwcLepIK7Ro9J7Ik+vNR30wjxaiOxem0f1gaKq1ZB6QSbfzE J7gHomAAkaew5MMJCLSgukZJXwkheGCx7gusphke5lf9AwFGMrVHe7RjarTLrMc0RIDc sko7bkdQJKikpkuWidhAyyKjGkO7Zcohoi+VcTDxcu/kr+4LYYnXdxmTw54Ax+iRiuVS mtDoLm2SP2s8hPWFyHpEwtIKVHq0MX4kkFMKd0Dvti9JFX5yPIuul5aPdmjgTeMh6IM1 Wl2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=EBCfRCyN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s26si5308599edq.433.2020.04.30.08.42.20; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:42:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=EBCfRCyN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727879AbgD3Pic (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:38:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43380 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726420AbgD3Pib (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:38:31 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x844.google.com (mail-qt1-x844.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::844]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 818D9C035494 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x844.google.com with SMTP id x12so5307129qts.9 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:38:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=P9HhjXHjgQ2uRdTOdCGFRzrISVJUe9hHihb1s6U+pG0=; b=EBCfRCyNsTlDJFaRQRt4ZOByXKwsez2d0WVoOUVj0uyzY2FQjjUArA4Cdr92cMp5yy 00zTxOzpBt6C0OXx4Ubu0BX+XEnhoymU29QAZiSeYC1TaiquQ6Guo8m/i8tGqEPIt2Yt upoTJJeeNPy2dAk4ETUD4kl9Dplk18J7ntJnI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=P9HhjXHjgQ2uRdTOdCGFRzrISVJUe9hHihb1s6U+pG0=; b=T4HkOpwyeUhAL+zOhor/b8cbkyQBUHtgTDClDdMRvLjlx3uByi87iFkd9pI3Tagnqo yecjY2Lb2ozsh6um0vrcq/puzB0plL5bhe4YVt9A7zl0oSgcJvJniwiuVgiyOyBhnQE6 N+VvBjdeXh0xJ3UZ8uigKXFLcFtMz6CjWbtPyFeJ8volN7X6C7B6AOLbN3FxZ4ee8e95 P7wCdrFl76cjE0fot7kwpwZyyS0DTBSWkkw5QtjPYShTY/XLXUDuI5OgirzD4TBabs9d aJ7YBn+FNwUr6skTYTLjtFx2UJTH3q417UJ5HEslT2tYDrlICQrFk/rBd3ot+QPRoH0P KrQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuawiKRClGwvDDklcYVGP816Kfh/4CRGM6OI8waT+B64PJh2Uf9f rXgfbXjysLV9itHG0JPvAoYx4PPwPgI= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:66d8:: with SMTP id m24mr4296291qtp.175.1588261109694; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yb1-f169.google.com (mail-yb1-f169.google.com. [209.85.219.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o13sm277866qke.77.2020.04.30.08.38.27 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f169.google.com with SMTP id v10so3427262ybk.3 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:38:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5b:483:: with SMTP id n3mr6464401ybp.519.1588261107424; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:38:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1588093804-30446-1-git-send-email-michalorzel.eng@gmail.com> <875zdiacv2.fsf@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <875zdiacv2.fsf@intel.com> From: Sean Paul Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:37:49 -0400 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Replace drm_modeset_lock/unlock_all with DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_* helpers To: Jani Nikula Cc: Michal Orzel , Maarten Lankhorst , mripard@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de, Dave Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Intel Graphics Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dri-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 4:57 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, Michal Orzel wrote: > > As suggested by the TODO list for the kernel DRM subsystem, replace > > the deprecated functions that take/drop modeset locks with new helpers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c | 10 ++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c > > index 35c2719..901b078 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c > > @@ -402,12 +402,13 @@ int drm_mode_obj_get_properties_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > > { > > struct drm_mode_obj_get_properties *arg = data; > > struct drm_mode_object *obj; > > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx; > > int ret = 0; > > > > if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) > > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > > - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev); > > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN(dev, ctx, 0, ret); > > I cry a little every time I look at the DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN and > DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END macros. :( > > Currently only six users... but there are ~60 calls to > drm_modeset_lock_all{,_ctx} that I presume are to be replaced. I wonder > if this will come back and haunt us. > What's the alternative? Seems like the options without the macros is to use incorrect scope or have a bunch of retry/backoff cargo-cult everywhere (and hope the copy source is done correctly). Sean > BR, > Jani. > > > > > > obj = drm_mode_object_find(dev, file_priv, arg->obj_id, arg->obj_type); > > if (!obj) { > > @@ -427,7 +428,7 @@ int drm_mode_obj_get_properties_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > > out_unref: > > drm_mode_object_put(obj); > > out: > > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev); > > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(ctx, ret); > > return ret; > > } > > > > @@ -449,12 +450,13 @@ static int set_property_legacy(struct drm_mode_object *obj, > > { > > struct drm_device *dev = prop->dev; > > struct drm_mode_object *ref; > > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx; > > int ret = -EINVAL; > > > > if (!drm_property_change_valid_get(prop, prop_value, &ref)) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev); > > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN(dev, ctx, 0, ret); > > switch (obj->type) { > > case DRM_MODE_OBJECT_CONNECTOR: > > ret = drm_connector_set_obj_prop(obj, prop, prop_value); > > @@ -468,7 +470,7 @@ static int set_property_legacy(struct drm_mode_object *obj, > > break; > > } > > drm_property_change_valid_put(prop, ref); > > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev); > > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(ctx, ret); > > > > return ret; > > } > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center