Received: by 2002:a17:90a:728b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e11csp2417680pjg; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:24:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKbymtv8oJ3HcEq7F4nKXLXOyaupBQeOMItqfRkG+AWo61GGlT+XBdkVrAiN4MRBumddLxO X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c113:: with SMTP id do19mr4113433ejc.286.1588271047171; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:24:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588271047; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cRI9bP2FfphYWFDeGDrvOZgWwQ5IeF9ah6bj5Swf01tPnD0qgiQhiViGYx+Aoj02KS OvfXw7hIeht/TZvFgZZx2lJjid4P2OlgWd2mcANptrqxAbdJj+QIRN6XclY1Ebp1RG1z UTPuuqOt6EiaUxIrLBMCk4J17IXpeOft71cEOulsonV12m1Vkrlh+iACoNgi2kVRjv07 6Wkel6hkERn9OwX7UVkd28g6yR1K6frZW+jWetUFD++6QZXc+ETXWGFy+nFTW5oimPUk fNsZ3WgwC1Bxqmx3wZ8Gas86x9TZeyznq0DdRx566G+cpY6oFOiYRNExTxmqAvKe/Cit i5hg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=9bnN0jI9PpebfLlzle27LF+K1qdqpCoCM8TnYKAG3w8=; b=TBkBpktVocx2RIq0IgjlSlHEI3rUpEBjOd0i9UnS/PCBgUJJt43UXCpo9DPhvTFHoT 86zXLVaVXGLOkeazHD+i64kkDUZYR2gxOxugE+rZ+56lUxFSgU8LYOP3nXS+rIbFAFjT 6FgFiE4tkotlQ754/BUaqImXFDXfVflCkIQ7E/Zabhf5lgrxVEzGMscW7ggKydCfYa6Q Jz0snXg+0racpd0EoNDjbGVvU2mKDUw2HTii4GYA8u78QuvifJX/Qiw3yvOg5UGv3w0m t+2t15tzZH6zyG+w+/J2ajTTSPEC4jQ4p3RWipi8RWd+n66zVY/zTKCCCKIGGKrAifmD YAnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qn16si283621ejb.66.2020.04.30.11.23.43; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726562AbgD3SVh (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:21:37 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:60060 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725844AbgD3SVg (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:21:36 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C649C101E; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E45CC3F73D; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/uclamp: Add a new sysctl to control RT default boost value To: Qais Yousef , Pavan Kondeti Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Jonathan Corbet , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , Quentin Perret , Valentin Schneider , Patrick Bellasi , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <20200428164134.5588-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> <20200429113255.GA19464@codeaurora.org> <20200429123056.otyedhljlugyf5we@e107158-lin> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:21:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200429123056.otyedhljlugyf5we@e107158-lin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/04/2020 14:30, Qais Yousef wrote: > Hi Pavan > > On 04/29/20 17:02, Pavan Kondeti wrote: >> Hi Qais, >> >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:41:33PM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote: [...] >>> @@ -907,8 +935,15 @@ uclamp_tg_restrict(struct task_struct *p, enum uclamp_id clamp_id) >>> static inline struct uclamp_se >>> uclamp_eff_get(struct task_struct *p, enum uclamp_id clamp_id) >>> { >>> - struct uclamp_se uc_req = uclamp_tg_restrict(p, clamp_id); >>> - struct uclamp_se uc_max = uclamp_default[clamp_id]; >>> + struct uclamp_se uc_req, uc_max; >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * Sync up any change to sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min_rt_default value. >>> + */ >>> + uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_default(p); >>> + >>> + uc_req = uclamp_tg_restrict(p, clamp_id); >>> + uc_max = uclamp_default[clamp_id]; >> >> We are calling uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_default() unnecessarily for >> clamp_id == UCLAMP_MAX case. Would it be better to have a separate > > It was actually intentional to make sure we update the value ASAP. I didn't > think it's a lot of overhead. I can further protect with a check to verify > whether the value has changed if it seems heavy handed. Users of uclamp_eff_value()->uclamp_eff_get() ((like rt_task_fits_capacity())) always call both ids. So calling uclamp_sync_util_min_rt_default() only for UCLAMP_MIN would make sense. It's overhead in the fast path for rt tasks. Since changes to sched_util_clamp_min_rt_default will be fairly rare, you might even want to consider only doing the uclamp_se_set(..., min_rt_default, ...) in case uc_se->value != sysctl_sched_uclamp_util_min_rt_default [...]