Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp2263647ybz; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:56:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJirgBGDx2BpEstjNNsvUGq7MsBOgy+R3rHwyMNMnF+ySthNGRPhP3cP/VEsZxz6O9/YCjQ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:ce0f:: with SMTP id d15mr816862edv.290.1588280208382; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:56:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588280208; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uGK+8KVFo9z2XhhfDrq30MBh8TlMSdcrMtquVd9ClcFuKzau7jokR+tftFNi7x7wGW Tuh7FBfzOKhXX7UzerDJGiRnG8bjwCDk3Dt6atU6uP+mbShCY5v80UUzr/gtYDQ4cfUQ anatBow1x6mCVX8A1nLTcnIRSYqR8Wi0ElpRLdVHNvavN11jHWSOtwKcE/pIF5q7B26Y Mt86xPeycjg+JlcsEIsKKTjAx2GeepRaCdri3LSzLlikFrRdfeX5JRusYMJ4ZAxCffi8 S1HlNYiuPTqhunFpHxJWmdpX7nJ/Z7zyvsbgBK3f1OtxRq8IAhqcPch1nvJSJhPd/Qnt 9Vuw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Z/T+sqjzriwApQPNZZiP/b1FdETZszA1CYwNdpGLAcw=; b=YvUaDB3W299kR4Wvdaaak+Hd/RHQvccq3YW9dhABWguadazrq5ubNjSbeFwEn1KYOx T3xR0GXc5kfdYKii3TjsHeI3ovhDyN/VIndrx0mOUVbC3PeX7HwXG9lBNa/prI5tnI/o EOB4WXroxOyndgEyecmoLmppgPN8U7rWSl7MBvNvLyq/lB6TKEZKllSPpxFlN9MqCBQo AmN1QP7vrbHn/t4JPKHb55rf8GXGHAMiL3bNUpFZ5ZWAApiYzVDEsx1M87itC4BWfJfw SDdnW+0hO48lzZ4PCqFopFtFX67EHVx00/suDPTy9YBnjXWJl0kRz6to/JNeWf10JWeI VUWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=NP2qv5b+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w22si477245edu.568.2020.04.30.13.56.20; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=NP2qv5b+; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726554AbgD3Uvr (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:51:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36478 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726338AbgD3Uvq (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:51:46 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x441.google.com (mail-pf1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::441]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6F70C035495 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x441.google.com with SMTP id x77so487835pfc.0 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:51:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Z/T+sqjzriwApQPNZZiP/b1FdETZszA1CYwNdpGLAcw=; b=NP2qv5b+jPWNia/NbPWik2u7QNt3CPH39cpq5jmaPXD5hlUnZTgj946oxqA0XZBcmT Dd5AvKrs76qyF6sQNkqlTqLgTAhO6QrUJ1ySM+wuzaHfowQhvrbJfBFzFffjcxiqJuAL x0eDANLjWuPqo5cySfLNcjAdGzQ3Kesulvrin4uoFOBGvsR2xNHSGvncJiG70chn84pN pXeFekkfkuCwIl30ZuWITGr0o36iYOWxw4ubIvmxdlTa2rD8yEhCyiVhD1XEZbUZkUMn /8+P6IPrcg4piPhOlP52LxjVpOxq6fXRXhAr6sjXtQVtHmElAwhu/XDWqhAaKWGRBjCD v+qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Z/T+sqjzriwApQPNZZiP/b1FdETZszA1CYwNdpGLAcw=; b=fQ1jcdZUyqiAQ5zTQXrcAaip4KEBkHoM24mRt6ZJXn8xlX8T2pKZlqnrSYCQ/a/kKI pbkNyZe7dzlzsqCOHEI8wMRKbWx+uE5coBjnY4R+wO9LT9QWU4/FEt3ufpTR0jVTvEJE PaJV47rNpNZzfzcMc56kJAN1vmH0vykD/mNIzV+orHiNiQLR2BeLMygFuBjlrPy2I60U 6IXoApf0BveuRA7Uxx9TNIZFczv8z9MnXURT54Nhvug1LIF4vHTAbEQZ53K3rxsE1E1W HVMSOJL+p0ejb4HccaWi88blEQ+WreVcciwyZ3IyPE7bNjRto+kEeoMq6zg16kv8Bbiy PCnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubiQBmlP027J4tCOjtaSgsY/qiwCQV2nluWTPCXK06tNDpSf1ks ErsRvcUp0tX+s7idrFnZeyo7mw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:3d43:: with SMTP id k64mr825299pga.150.1588279905969; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 (S0106002369de4dac.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.8.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fy21sm548254pjb.25.2020.04.30.13.51.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:51:43 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Arnaud POULIQUEN Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com, loic.pallardy@st.com, s-anna@ti.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] remoteproc: Introducing function rproc_set_state_machine() Message-ID: <20200430205143.GC18004@xps15> References: <20200424200135.28825-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> <20200424200135.28825-13-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> <1438e3f6-3d8a-7edd-f552-b01f84316ec7@st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438e3f6-3d8a-7edd-f552-b01f84316ec7@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 04:38:54PM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > > > On 4/29/20 11:22 AM, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: > > > > > > On 4/24/20 10:01 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > >> Introducting function rproc_set_state_machine() to add > >> operations and a set of flags to use when synchronising with > >> a remote processor. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier > >> --- > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 6 +++ > >> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 3 ++ > >> 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> index 48afa1f80a8f..5c48714e8702 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> @@ -2065,6 +2065,59 @@ int devm_rproc_add(struct device *dev, struct rproc *rproc) > >> } > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_rproc_add); > >> > >> +/** > >> + * rproc_set_state_machine() - Set a synchronisation ops and set of flags > >> + * to use with a remote processor > >> + * @rproc: The remote processor to work with > >> + * @sync_ops: The operations to use when synchronising with a remote > >> + * processor > >> + * @sync_flags: The flags to use when deciding if the remoteproc core > >> + * should be synchronising with a remote processor > >> + * > >> + * Returns 0 on success, an error code otherwise. > >> + */ > >> +int rproc_set_state_machine(struct rproc *rproc, > >> + const struct rproc_ops *sync_ops, > >> + struct rproc_sync_flags sync_flags) > > > > So this API should be called by platform driver only in case of synchronization > > support, right? > > In this case i would rename it as there is also a state machine in "normal" boot > > proposal: rproc_set_sync_machine or rproc_set_sync_state_machine > > > > Reviewing the stm32 series, i wonder if sync_flags should be a pointer to a const structure > as the platform driver should not update it during the rproc live cycle. > Then IMO, using a pointer to the structure instead of the structure seems more > in line with the rest of the remoteproc API. Humm... If we do make sync_flags constant then the platform drivers can't modify the values dynamically, as I did in the stm32 series. This is something Loic had asked for. Moreover function rproc_set_state_machine() can't be called twice so updating the sync_flags can't happen. > > >> +{ > >> + if (!rproc || !sync_ops) > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + > >> + /* > >> + * No point in going further if we never have to synchronise with > >> + * the remote processor. > >> + */ > >> + if (!sync_flags.on_init && > >> + !sync_flags.after_stop && !sync_flags.after_crash) > >> + return 0; > >> + > >> + /* > >> + * Refuse to go further if remoteproc operations have been allocated > >> + * but they will never be used. > >> + */ > >> + if (rproc->ops && sync_flags.on_init && > >> + sync_flags.after_stop && sync_flags.after_crash) > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + > >> + /* > >> + * Don't allow users to set this more than once to avoid situations > >> + * where the remote processor can't be recovered. > >> + */ > >> + if (rproc->sync_ops) > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + > >> + rproc->sync_ops = kmemdup(sync_ops, sizeof(*sync_ops), GFP_KERNEL); > >> + if (!rproc->sync_ops) > >> + return -ENOMEM; > >> + > >> + rproc->sync_flags = sync_flags; > >> + /* Tell the core what to do when initialising */ > >> + rproc_set_sync_flag(rproc, RPROC_SYNC_STATE_INIT); > > > > Is there a use case where sync_flags.on_init is false and other flags are true? > > > > Look like on_init is useless and should not be exposed to the platform driver. > > Or comments are missing to explain the usage of it vs the other flags. > > > > Regards, > > Arnaud > > > >> + > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_set_state_machine); > >> + > >> /** > >> * rproc_type_release() - release a remote processor instance > >> * @dev: the rproc's device > >> @@ -2088,6 +2141,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev) > >> kfree_const(rproc->firmware); > >> kfree_const(rproc->name); > >> kfree(rproc->ops); > >> + kfree(rproc->sync_ops); > >> kfree(rproc); > >> } > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> index 7dcc0a26892b..c1a293a37c78 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace { > >> /* > >> * enum rproc_sync_states - remote processsor sync states > >> * > >> + * @RPROC_SYNC_STATE_INIT state to use when the remoteproc core > >> + * is initialising. > >> * @RPROC_SYNC_STATE_SHUTDOWN state to use after the remoteproc core > >> * has shutdown (rproc_shutdown()) the > >> * remote processor. > >> @@ -39,6 +41,7 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace { > >> * operation to use. > >> */ > >> enum rproc_sync_states { > >> + RPROC_SYNC_STATE_INIT, > >> RPROC_SYNC_STATE_SHUTDOWN, > >> RPROC_SYNC_STATE_CRASHED, > >> }; > >> @@ -47,6 +50,9 @@ static inline void rproc_set_sync_flag(struct rproc *rproc, > >> enum rproc_sync_states state) > >> { > >> switch (state) { > >> + case RPROC_SYNC_STATE_INIT: > >> + rproc->sync_with_rproc = rproc->sync_flags.on_init; > >> + break; > >> case RPROC_SYNC_STATE_SHUTDOWN: > >> rproc->sync_with_rproc = rproc->sync_flags.after_stop; > >> break; > >> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > >> index ceb3b2bba824..a75ed92b3de6 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > >> @@ -619,6 +619,9 @@ struct rproc *rproc_get_by_child(struct device *dev); > >> struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name, > >> const struct rproc_ops *ops, > >> const char *firmware, int len); > >> +int rproc_set_state_machine(struct rproc *rproc, > >> + const struct rproc_ops *sync_ops, > >> + struct rproc_sync_flags sync_flags); > >> void rproc_put(struct rproc *rproc); > >> int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc); > >> int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc); > >>