Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp2289681ybz; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:27:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI45QN4kTxUngFc534L31aiA3CotUQJ6mAg1UJvy+vh0wBzMosl0GPBuypNRby4iwr27JYk X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:31b6:: with SMTP id dj22mr993268edb.258.1588282038196; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:27:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588282038; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DDBjAP07iT/M2Iq976W4fFV/quX8BLq2GOAI1xP0PiZKJS5eMBJGIKdixc5qTtbBD5 2L3P84uPGZB/HNIJuj0imNGttSbvRXELhNp2Gnz5RpfzJr1Vvtfgr3PmJhXsaXGYpvpZ zmq1Bls6NQiogLrzzLGvrzf2GHlo6K4nfQixeuDg9ssYkzQkrGG//XCuMmVlOPPcT4qz 04sH5392gqNiSPR56c4ZNHCcFPTbL188eSN/ERfWwdS5sQz5O8ulKG65IHYKoK079QtV hUDjqVcIssek6Qud7rbHuBJS4Uu7PDtmk2xNe6/hXv4dP2REOvCezg3q0arUmUI27Mv/ XnBg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=DWrD6mXLn/utSObccvqo9dliyIxc01DfzqJXlZIZ8p0=; b=S9ix2nkquNR/MmMAzZpr2t0D5pFIs9d1ULTmLIbdtQCtO6WIP3azr1uJtgN9dLQfrd pZBkeQOxnNm5wcDU/WOopSi34bCSxVkF4bZMnsIBm3uk3lPttpj1LOET0oAPsZmedzMr zQhmoDnBqRUloNfu0jbmvG1dcNc84d7Cp/VTkqfFaiagVfgEw9boxA0nfGGrhWPjFptJ 65/Wm7vhoC5LtEZscERxe7ulMEWSyYnHX5OPPI2vHEBiX93u+LhupFhN+PzRJNfF8viB w9SvULzSLETGSIKS7SP0i+a2lVOmEcvuY4l+ndpYr8SaCuJ2s52RRK2DGMzsK4gwnH2T yNcg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=QAitjNdy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 3si555895ejz.2.2020.04.30.14.26.54; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=QAitjNdy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726973AbgD3VXM (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:23:12 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40378 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726483AbgD3VXM (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:23:12 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 302412166E; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 21:23:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588281792; bh=64VkPdoiN0OePS1AJNJImnN0TBSj5RZkl5WHr7pH2zc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QAitjNdyFZAKZsl9w/HSamjjGQ43tPG20k8YV2BhA6BAzLoL8vXNaWoF9UMgfQlOl pz18SKiCyaRhywDfyy1jCV0/LK15E/q4uBqFP8Tx1y3f51UjeysrNXGr/bRGdaLgLN gix2QWqIln1sTlUAN7qwXwkBNh3ycqNJqvImuaK4= Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:23:11 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Souptick Joarder Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/gup.c: Handle error at earliest for incorrect nr_pages value Message-Id: <20200430142311.091b82235141ca47b9c6475a@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1588277518-21425-1-git-send-email-jrdr.linux@gmail.com> References: <1588277518-21425-1-git-send-email-jrdr.linux@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 1 May 2020 01:41:58 +0530 Souptick Joarder wrote: > As per documentation, pin_user_pages_fast() & get_user_pages_fast() > will return 0, if nr_pages <= 0. But this can be figure out only after > going inside the internal_get_user_pages_fast(). > > This can be handled early. Adding a check for the same. Calling get_user_pages() for (nrpages <= 0) is a nonsensical thing to do so it isn't a thing we should care to optimize. Adding new checks will actually slow down the use cases which we *do* care about. And it adds more code.