Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:45:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:45:27 -0400 Received: from mailhost.idcomm.com ([207.40.196.14]:51868 "EHLO mailhost.idcomm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:44:32 -0400 Message-ID: <3BD4776C.DEC87CB5@idcomm.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:45:48 -0600 From: "D. Stimits" Reply-To: stimits@idcomm.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6-pre1-xfs-4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10 In-Reply-To: <86256AED.005FB443.00@smtpnotes.altec.com> <200110221745.f9MHjvF04940@schroeder.cs.wisc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick LeRoy wrote: > > Wayne, everybody.. > > I hate to belabor this point, but I'm in full agreement. If I really > believed that Alan's boycott would have *any* positive affect, I'd fully > support it, but the reality of the situation is that Wayne is right -- nobody > with any real power will ever know or be able to a difference. I think that > civil disobiediance is the only sensible action. I wish I had a vote in Senator Hollings jurisdiction, I'd try to have him impeached or recalled. It would never work, but it might open some eyes. D. Stimits, stimits@idcomm.com > > -Nick > > On Monday 22 October 2001 12:21, Wayne.Brown@altec.com wrote: > > It's highly unlikely that Alan withholding information from a handful of US > > Linux users and developers will have any effect on US laws. Plenty of us > > have complained already to our elected officials, without results. The > > number of people who would care (or even know) about Alan's security > > boycott -- even if it includes the entire US readership of linux-kernel -- > > is vanishingly small compared to the general population, and no politician > > is going to pay attention to such a small and dilute constituency. All a > > policy of secrecy will accomplish is to punish US kernel hackers (who > > probably disagree with the DMCA as much as the rest of you) and have no > > effect on the average citizen who doesn't have a clue about either the DMCA > > or Linux. I'm seeing a disturbing trend here; with all the talk about this > > topic and about EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL here lately, I'm starting to think > > linux-kernel is more about restricting information than disseminating it. > > > > I believe the DCMA should be treated like firearms laws or any other bad > > laws: Fight them where possible, and disobey them where fighting them is > > not possible. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/