Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp665682ybz; Fri, 1 May 2020 06:27:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJS+Jt9bY3kJ3inCm3hX6lU/2Mesd8kl3z4XUwf9eWCrywfmOONxLABRO1yJ+zH7k/OtKd3 X-Received: by 2002:a50:b412:: with SMTP id b18mr3460111edh.42.1588339674023; Fri, 01 May 2020 06:27:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588339674; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NQzHWy4HnmrBVd8EvIEHW6zCX784ziOC1mm13d2QYhjeECldSkztEeX0qWpsUYiQ6J c0uZtcfIPgahGAghhDsbFk9P5dretHKa9MZsTbwuF08wJMPH/oY0MYhO+ouXtL98Z+2f Cm9XQksXjCjtLw0VbfDe2OUZ7GmbPIiDOUaT5Q0IQ6P5DufAhyVSQ+RXHtY6bFDc0GU4 lPLLYPM6QDIlLYNMjk6LYZ8YKX8Abw4r6jocnMGDEQS14BhCqaJ6yBo4nKKcSfPS3CdE kYVym2f9l3LRIJorCe9iCHs7hc02sqWpsYq7BRUEgT0ZZzoqNART3xwPXg/6ckEAKsA1 BbnQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=TYVtStNnttdZVnZyR+dxoBZYxfiqNf3iN8Gyx8Ni2aQ=; b=Tp3JS9kpfRaQ67alwkYJGyOS7Fpcxmg4xKEni6I9Tb3yWKZybcojBDek772esNo8yy AgNZErDpUZpBKAQB+ygEtv72iOOVL1BcoBhvW2wCdhNaYyHRiHyV+zzB8irPfwmmDZAz n/5hHK/4yYCv9RnZExJdHQimfTLqMLqVs+jLc7Rtj4cGh6KDIA4/Bi/5pDodEIJBOF67 Sm+BVAJtZ5MPx5MnOMLvlySnpNR7fZDDm4VV04CxiWtdqFX5D8mq5bNqlPmGryHxzHtF nNmQ8905gkcHTwsIxAC3ITaFDRzJRzpcggDP/cnqsGMh5E+qb1d7DAZyD8mP0DzSZyZC hosw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ci23si1727541ejb.133.2020.05.01.06.27.30; Fri, 01 May 2020 06:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728868AbgEANYH (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 May 2020 09:24:07 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44760 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728586AbgEANYG (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2020 09:24:06 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5BE920757; Fri, 1 May 2020 13:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 09:24:04 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86/ftrace: Have ftrace trampolines turn read-only at the end of system boot up Message-ID: <20200501092404.06d1adcb@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20200501051706.4wkrqwovybt2p6hr@treble> References: <20200430202147.4dc6e2de@oasis.local.home> <20200501044733.eqf6hc6erucsd43x@treble> <20200501051706.4wkrqwovybt2p6hr@treble> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 1 May 2020 00:17:06 -0500 Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > Would it be easier to just call a new __text_poke_bp() which skips the > > SYSTEM_BOOTING check, since you know the trampoline will always be > > read-only? > > > > Like: > > early_trace_init() is called after mm_init(), so I thought it might > work, but I guess not: Yeah, I was about to say that this happens before mm_init() ;-) It's why we already have magic for enabling function tracing the first time. Do you see anything wrong with this current solution? It probably needs more comments, but I wanted to get acceptance on the logic before I go and pretty it up and send a non RFC patch. -- Steve