Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932238AbWCHK1c (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:27:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932390AbWCHK1c (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:27:32 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:46268 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932238AbWCHK1c (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:27:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:27:31 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Anshuman Gholap Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers. Message-ID: <20060308102731.GO27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 852 Lines: 17 On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:05:11PM +0530, Anshuman Gholap wrote: > 1) The people who have control over linux kernel as of now are > countable on hands but cannot be held countable for work cause they do > it as hobby/"insert anything which says working for free", now for a > peice of code like linux kernel, such kind of aloofness regarding > manpower and kind_of nazism in not allowing others to dynamically > get_work_done (like binary driver) seems totally wrong. > This email is very raw and not polished at all Indeed - self-godwinated right in the opening salvo. Tsk, tsk... Trolls these days... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/