Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932415AbWCHKwb (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:52:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932466AbWCHKwb (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:52:31 -0500 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.195]:58856 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932415AbWCHKwa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:52:30 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CMhar6fFTZ6JYzVbo4bGY7/WrAzKQJBnV79ep9Y8x+RDedCXhHRAVQMhSOGXBp5jbvCS0ZhRs5mTHDwamCB9UECQo9YFJr6sjKBUJmLo7tXoIAnkYxZ4biQA8HadSXRV+5u9w/wQbRuA/cgMJX7j1FZC23XRr0EaWEaNy1FnQp0= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 16:22:29 +0530 From: "Anshuman Gholap" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers. Cc: "Al Viro" In-Reply-To: <20060308102731.GO27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060308102731.GO27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1856 Lines: 42 well ya, I knew i was running the risk to be labelled like that, cause i thought to talk of this issue, more shake is needed that just stir. please dont get me wrong (even though i think most of you already have), i own my graditude for the livelihood i am having to linux,linus and co. this discussion is totally for betterment of the new users who should not be forced to become developers in order to get a trival thing running on their desktop/laptop, like device driver. Now that i think of this, a more better person to speak on this would be device manufacturer's themselves, is it the state_of_current linux prohibiting them from developing drivers? do they hate oss so much? would their mentality and willingness change if binary/mixed license drivers were allowed to work with kernel. if you can send this thread link to dlink or any other manufacturer, please do. for now, i am going to shut my yapper. Anshuman. On 3/8/06, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:05:11PM +0530, Anshuman Gholap wrote: > > 1) The people who have control over linux kernel as of now are > > countable on hands but cannot be held countable for work cause they do > > it as hobby/"insert anything which says working for free", now for a > > peice of code like linux kernel, such kind of aloofness regarding > > manpower and kind_of nazism in not allowing others to dynamically > > get_work_done (like binary driver) seems totally wrong. > > > This email is very raw and not polished at all > > Indeed - self-godwinated right in the opening salvo. Tsk, tsk... Trolls > these days... > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/