Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 1 May 2020 12:50:22 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Remaining randconfig objtool warnings, linux-next-20200428
Message-ID: <20200501175022.yf3a34lu3ufui5ag@treble>
References: <CAK8P3a2qLJkokMGt48JRky=WUeAbJRuNmoD1oqfWdrGSC6y1LA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a2Gzj9SVZSGo+PxWR0cMJb1sFwv+ii9J6jEGE-Z41Fr+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a3exNWHzv7pyV4yvn2hPxUswzSF=G3UJ=evykT5bjfEsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200501172616.GG3762@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200501172616.GG3762@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 07:26:16PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 07:21:31PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 4:05 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > it gets into undefined behavior and stops emitting code after the call to
> 
> > Do we consider this expected behavior on gcc's side, or is it something
> > that should not happen and needs a gcc bug report?
> 
> When it hits UB it is of course free to do whatever it damn well
> pleases, but just stopping code gen seems a little extreme, at least
> issue a WARN that something is up or so.
> 
> Not sure how the GCC folks feel about this though.

When we've seen truncated code flow like this in the past, it's either
been a code bug (undefined behavior) or a GCC bug.  So this is new.

Is it only seen with GCC_PLUGIN_SANCOV enabled?  Maybe (hopefully) it's
an issue with the plugin and how it interacts with GCC 10.

-- 
Josh