Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp1112304ybz; Fri, 1 May 2020 14:56:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK2cgJlnTdGub9EjfCBX9qyhW98YNB4U5FuR2cEAv4z3YlIbDCsAcVkYOT7TOOXBoR4mYBX X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ef2:: with SMTP id x18mr5111574eji.234.1588370176689; Fri, 01 May 2020 14:56:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588370176; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XhxZbQnTfd6ytVAfyro5XCTAQtGm5e4/dAMqOc+hoIbkWSklZvxGctUKakUgahs42U Pdxr4omfK9Kqek4SbeD60LsqcDseaZN2ds9cZOLE+ZJ9NMcnnYSzFxXHjkVMtDar/PWE gFyh55Yi/uESIwWG6XgXyZLlASnj4n2z2F7INeqvQ+ywWw7MIsSecJ/EygDdDf4mMCnE m5NRJSpWtk/HnOKbvfkOE26L+jjeLwFwfDuzX73Mwn6G4HuYQ+jrM/s3/TOs/iQl0WXR /lFR050eX4k+B6LW+B/oCcCOfJORFVGl1eVcYTYW4bo9KNAbAqqc+HTHGN0rlA7QOiVs 2rMw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=fDcdLJDfds3fE+HORWk7IzQs+atWQYIIoYzFXgztNvg=; b=bQ8iLoxHBN4w00XJCJF/S6vovZHZmgXBX1SNjTUgOXT3S4We0+GNpVp/SYBxmwToEn GMR5hHM19hM7FJiWT9O8xUgvBC+L53ROMcZoPQGk2ujwwgDsCnhhLHwuiMFTmtgMLTfh 4vxBacDg2dnsa+pok1lEn7LYk63VMOuirGUysWbmeooO6zgAzwAsp+peZ0oG/BL9hRmG g4AqU8nULZJPxAcVHG254O4OD6ej3vH0TztX8Mn+4j/INi55mFlivdEDFgZ9aJT/zYBM phWjyOiJehA5dPgTf1nDbY4fxqcn7Svt5D2gyjXRjEoItSWsD2Mg3y7rcn8blhpYyzHz x9mg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zx2c4.com header.s=mail header.b=uEMjOfva; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zx2c4.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o25si2623010ejh.73.2020.05.01.14.55.54; Fri, 01 May 2020 14:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zx2c4.com header.s=mail header.b=uEMjOfva; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zx2c4.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726745AbgEAVyd (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 May 2020 17:54:33 -0400 Received: from mail.zx2c4.com ([192.95.5.64]:57327 "EHLO mail.zx2c4.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726045AbgEAVyd (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2020 17:54:33 -0400 Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 697688e6; Fri, 1 May 2020 21:42:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=mail; bh=58S7gafTvCyAaihiGAJkt1yLd6Y=; b=uEMjOf vaAoQm6Md4vl1zLH4e384tV3WtBAWLlgCo+K5pEl80lJ/GvpGM7c9fZDyOTsAkmv cuKynBhaCqSRHqZBzqTqWXv6Z4HbPF3NqtVfde1VMOZHGonxruz94B6y8j3TcIsU uMZdOgcG077zI+WnCV+P65QbA9sYgpXGtdgY65bj5PTj75+rbbisf87/GmQ91cZQ JKagWB9eEWX77XQ8c2TM5CYF9dNqiKFdiQQYRHI2ADz7Hzq/L2X0R66E2It3cZ/G U0lvdu8uQf4ysuexTDsNGdp569KlEKabIVY9ZUebiQQBot72XKZie2s2vflviruB QmdrxR8gpZsEXDxg== Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 9ab6eb77 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 1 May 2020 21:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-il1-f182.google.com with SMTP id w6so5722552ilg.1; Fri, 01 May 2020 14:54:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ2GNJJnpYDquv7xOZERTgYP9JgGeX/WqSkomrtz2kOdYBrBKZr qX1jxcTgSaN7zwft8k826ph+7CbwSej1MKn2GDU= X-Received: by 2002:a92:d98c:: with SMTP id r12mr5878280iln.224.1588370070637; Fri, 01 May 2020 14:54:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200430221016.3866-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20200501104215.s2eftchxm66lmbvj@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20200501104215.s2eftchxm66lmbvj@linutronix.de> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 15:54:19 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: check to see if SIMD registers are available before using SIMD To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: LKML , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel , Thomas Gleixner , Chris Wilson , stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:42 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Thanks. > > May I ask how large the memcpy can be? I'm asking in case it is large > and an explicit rescheduling point might be needed. Yea I was worried about that too. I'm not an i915 developer, but so far as I can tell: - The path from intel_engine_cmd_parser is <= 256 KiB for "known users", so that's rather large. - The path from perf_memcpy is either 4k, 64k, or 4M, depending on the type of object, so that seems gigantic, but I think that might be selftest code. - The path from compress_page appears to be PAGE_SIZE, so 4k, which meshes with the limits we set agreed on few weeks ago for the crypto stuff. - The path from guc_read_update_log_buffer appears to be 8k, 32k, 2M, or 8M, depending on the type of object, so that seems absurdly huge and doesn't appear to be selftest code either like the other case. I have no doubt the i915 developers will jump in here waving their arms, but either way, it sure seems to me like you might have a point.