Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:19:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:19:34 -0400 Received: from yinyang.hjsoft.com ([205.231.166.38]:47119 "EHLO yinyang.hjsoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:19:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:21:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mr. Shannon Aldinger" Reply-To: god@yinyang.hjsoft.com To: Gregory Ade cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: linux-kernel-legal? was (Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Gregory Ade wrote: > No, it's a Republic. More specifically, a representative democracy, which > means that we're at the mercy of the people we've given license to > represent us. They make all sorts of promises to get in office, and then > go do their own damn thing anyway. > Here I thought we had Republicans fighting to make the US a republic and Democrats fighting to make it a Democracy. Oh well, my mistake. Can someone start a seperate mailing list maybe linux-kernel-legal. It would be a good place for this and discussion of any other new laws, US and other that effect the kernel hackers. As a bonus it wouldn't distract from the patches. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iEYEARECAAYFAjvUf9QACgkQwtU6L/A4vVCa/wCaA3STfFIErhA3rl/4NpUvJSYV xLIAn0UsaExwEQj2Ir++XfqLmp7LRsRc =Ux3H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/