Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp1874776ybz; Sat, 2 May 2020 09:44:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLo7yq0k/cIBI8znrj08Eaum4oUuNpQNWmkbGA9rRuCcRuITybWcxUqlBWBZB5Lu737jOn3 X-Received: by 2002:a50:f390:: with SMTP id g16mr7858437edm.211.1588437872429; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:44:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588437872; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HuRx0tgsuednGuFbnVjZM0UZxjag51+Yx550lVXC9vCk8Sv8peOmQqGaaP+AL6lEQy 3/27BkhIWjHmRbwlsJSVBxnFAhK1ruWWxcltap04czAOsZbv0D7FG819FPbYg+XSD3cf tPu4f1fwrEcBentBD/Erz2dQ7fOZxp1C13krjRzsotzaq2LLD83L55ZnIk5TVxZqGxJU wpVyf1jfqfcWIWx4NUOxtw2vBhrDJkVNKSPpMbPJefvanfX+wZlm0oeUbAXZG+hS6U+Y MFdZDAz8cMyl8ipJ+WDhrnT4EQh8OWz/81wKlHaEvLds6MdwSLqbMPbPoljbz89iJdKL Rrqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=OidOSfoLTFcT8l45mrEaIKuRu8kYn+JXy7OweRfj4xs=; b=TyI+WcTHrXEdiJE26lcYdhyJ4JjRw3z1fQQq4BDzyVE3vdNEe+fnNNRP0h3bk6XDAF XK5gGBzTcIDVvSCrqq5kJAhPCWi4mRzM1fPHc2UYD6DlnsqzERc4e16e0h2MaomQCgHs s4tk2uq3y5pQjPwf4TaAFAV8X5rvFQinHOdAoJOQk0pHTJDDEzo+CxZXCyDLrAb73wx1 ylU91jeytAfBscfBBXPYQ9BIDBWfFMA5pX9rJPGAOZ0Vms1GWTRXLSOyQENFxqP/d3DU obaPmWXF6oHCBXHyawyilO8EUEUeHdjARacqWmi5TTL0mdD1qYx+amEE7R82SIfcQv42 4eKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=W3u4kTy0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n15si3732799edq.470.2020.05.02.09.44.08; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=W3u4kTy0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728392AbgEBQmK (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 2 May 2020 12:42:10 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:20706 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728312AbgEBQmJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2020 12:42:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588437728; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OidOSfoLTFcT8l45mrEaIKuRu8kYn+JXy7OweRfj4xs=; b=W3u4kTy0QYTTrAFEbj4B6PBUaIE+rSsFU14yKNMOtI2y9OdzYo3XY30sArWU1r+z5IDrKz uuHLIuc9JBnO9E99SSO3883WF/cKVLCnJyV+EfdIAAkKX/lZl5fo47cm3tCFhxffL+w94R 7fZ66zn3wAIPVwXeGl3SXLiPeRyAJQ4= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-55-WwsBEZy2MgytEWw85uPyPA-1; Sat, 02 May 2020 12:42:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: WwsBEZy2MgytEWw85uPyPA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id d134so6033997wmd.0 for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:42:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OidOSfoLTFcT8l45mrEaIKuRu8kYn+JXy7OweRfj4xs=; b=D21ImpoelEs2w6REWVU9W+JICrroafVULoF33yF2mvuUU820rXURYJvLUS0WHZnZKH 1IOX3qzm4bUcc2eXnLdSb8NswHLE/G6K48uDxVe4Z4Yx5AAk8ZcGZJraACBYatcnDDl3 0UD2ZPXYALhx6N7kXMqSsg5p4im70S7tZzzCs3tEzTYJ5IrCdRUuORQRi4oLbq8pvjSB G9Y9eXFku04/HoMsIg9+cC+/Xlk3Tkfc0Qcat6e9mqjg9i7BQxQJNPTBXAgj03GFLNkU EQt+pnTXqOA0NtLFfZHeh2LmQnPpVlZJon7lfBtpse+Q8CZ/SrzDs1m/U2w6nxN9wrSY 5UmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZsyxW9Z0MlNkyJ1wPVZsxTCAYKmWn3im5iNcGJ0dqA7IlnsaIR 4XWPo8h1wws5zNoaxR3bEngXqmgGLoGbHtRqwitZqFVuc12QFnoX5/QheuB52pFnsO9pSKjW9Ah xKyhWRUDZ9jq35ACPCoGv7K5S X-Received: by 2002:adf:ce02:: with SMTP id p2mr9893077wrn.173.1588437724966; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:42:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:ce02:: with SMTP id p2mr9893066wrn.173.1588437724734; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:1000:6128:564:d837? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:1000:6128:564:d837]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d7sm9923543wrn.78.2020.05.02.09.42.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 May 2020 09:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: AVIC related warning in enable_irq_window To: Maxim Levitsky , kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <9ce7bb5c4fb8bcc4ac21103f7534a6edfcbe195d.camel@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <758b27a8-74c0-087d-d90b-d95faee2f561@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 18:42:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9ce7bb5c4fb8bcc4ac21103f7534a6edfcbe195d.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/05/20 15:58, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > The AVIC is disabled by svm_toggle_avic_for_irq_window, which calls > kvm_request_apicv_update, which broadcasts the KVM_REQ_APICV_UPDATE vcpu request, > however it doesn't broadcast it to CPU on which now we are running, which seems OK, > because the code that handles that broadcast runs on each VCPU entry, thus > when this CPU will enter guest mode it will notice and disable the AVIC. > > However later in svm_enable_vintr, there is test 'WARN_ON(kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(&svm->vcpu));' > which is still true on current CPU because of the above. Good point! We can just remove the WARN_ON I think. Can you send a patch? svm_set_vintr also has a rather silly static void svm_set_vintr(struct vcpu_svm *svm) { set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_VINTR); if (is_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_VINTR)) svm_enable_vintr(svm); } so I'm thinking of just inlining svm_enable_vintr and renaming svm_{set,clear}_vintr to svm_{enable,disable}_vintr_window. Would you like to send two patches for this, the first to remove the WARN_ON and the second to do the cleanup? Thanks, Paolo > The code containing this warning was added in commit > > 64b5bd27042639dfcc1534f01771b7b871a02ffe > KVM: nSVM: ignore L1 interrupt window while running L2 with V_INTR_MASKING=1