Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp2960658ybz; Sun, 3 May 2020 13:37:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLvgGiOV3NcAIfGNUyiYUcdwW9gg9QKYdygo4SjvDDGw9HcHewOlXlNzE89eSFMPgGoztRz X-Received: by 2002:a50:9547:: with SMTP id v7mr12454393eda.324.1588538228796; Sun, 03 May 2020 13:37:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588538228; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wLs/o1Rz/uoWHvG49LASM4RizPi5WozNe1dW3T2JPzoGNBMLECik8HacCSvH3KvwOj RJRXq8iQGLEypcqhtSfc8XFd8IsyLz0WaPVF/wfhmbjj48NWMaeyPQnhvTN/rJxK3jg6 giicIVp39zuFjhIFQz9Dw7hON835RaCnz3rntxvLbhGmwuwebpWPgZKjDcBtuyyW1Sel OhpEvrkDVixgwvHSnPwBUm/vmICC+VAUL4X2FIgxsZMAenP/nCdIwiGiO1R8RrTByBDC +wXgvro8ZKZFL6xGaZVQHDCfqKwrkhsKd9KiMjbdzJcTZGE0yBzxbrbUFHHKgIUe/wKX wcgg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=eJi19KknnILB04WPtAC7RvbNF8TgW2qt5zlgfMqqgpA=; b=TX6od0qpuT+HImdHU2NYJi7sbNYUTyE3/gYDkhXYc3kclFsrbdoXizZ2khayE+WkDM ILS7k5VFJawd/txAFwzoXigHknlc93pqYewg/u6EkrGCCXiRzEsIORpoGOZF0zjNJwp3 RMMNb15/jHzFqhNUWBTRPgIu6j88YBqqT8FmE0XYnPcmO/YVtJYmiFxjDZQmayDydscP tGMe08X9BnixIiL2DTiCQ33oGp7gNYXSG7uqPHdGt5y/3S9aU0a4niPRgegthXiVGEc4 CRRoD5P2UowQFTm/0A3ziv7FfXoyxk7IGgL8JheHBvRxf98qdk5BZKa9mGdU5DZrVI6Q OZrA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zx2c4.com header.s=mail header.b="e/VPTEL6"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zx2c4.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z16si5764896ejr.249.2020.05.03.13.36.44; Sun, 03 May 2020 13:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zx2c4.com header.s=mail header.b="e/VPTEL6"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zx2c4.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729101AbgECUfV (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 3 May 2020 16:35:21 -0400 Received: from mail.zx2c4.com ([192.95.5.64]:55001 "EHLO mail.zx2c4.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728949AbgECUfV (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 May 2020 16:35:21 -0400 Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id e7525e37; Sun, 3 May 2020 20:22:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=mail; bh=z5Do7NyDKuHfMJ/mAldD8G6RJ60=; b=e/VPTE L65O0OQ1o9jg74xixPwpiZoUamL3h2sC5/EZ3eitxMEVhQ72lh4vZw82PPFwwIQn 3Ft31VWYR1iszDXqTIVyksn3ccsxfWJSY4CKtAMu0ASxTaJPkDeQ8Z3SXGV/ZUdr 7acbxP5Upx9fzjHZqlWrrWDLufLJWOlYdRZy/FjCR+1w0EyNI3RLST7C9U8Se01L 12Luica0tiD3Cpvy0xD3DxX/NIBBX1ny1Jj5ymBjl4HTzVr+G2YkzBCv0qMEegzu 7aFEViPQ26u858asbgXP8YKOcidXe2teSnLC6Q5wddff/R3mH8tsm7nkGmxsGM4s Frhisbmv1xPsyHaw== Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id b1037895 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 3 May 2020 20:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-il1-f181.google.com with SMTP id c16so9411832ilr.3; Sun, 03 May 2020 13:35:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZA+AWx/5FN9xzyBKuKGRtdXxxzmdHORCw4hdQySmWPGchOjy19 ITq2QH7nCSCeci02rMGJGoR0O0FqCl3icqr6jdM= X-Received: by 2002:a92:5c82:: with SMTP id d2mr13749187ilg.231.1588538114849; Sun, 03 May 2020 13:35:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200430221016.3866-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <158853782127.10831.11598587258154009671@build.alporthouse.com> In-Reply-To: <158853782127.10831.11598587258154009671@build.alporthouse.com> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 14:35:03 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: check to see if SIMD registers are available before using SIMD To: Chris Wilson Cc: Sebastian Siewior , dri-devel , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, LKML , Thomas Gleixner , stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 2:30 PM Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Jason A. Donenfeld (2020-04-30 23:10:16) > > Sometimes it's not okay to use SIMD registers, the conditions for which > > have changed subtly from kernel release to kernel release. Usually the > > pattern is to check for may_use_simd() and then fallback to using > > something slower in the unlikely case SIMD registers aren't available. > > So, this patch fixes up i915's accelerated memcpy routines to fallback > > to boring memcpy if may_use_simd() is false. > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > The same argument as on the previous submission is that we return to the > caller if we can't use movntqda as their fallback path should be faster > than uncached memcpy. Oh, THAT's what you meant before. Okay, will follow up.