Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: oEh9WLDoccDO1tCqLZu4CS4VGnMUC02EX7t94Lm4cMIol3MuBKAIREdKInEv3/8quIVKkZLzfq
 ++XZ8yVvvz9g==
IronPort-SDR: sTeKarLq7jLZgLfv76YD7tgCpaLe5Yi0j4r4MStyBV+Ctlfcl6hxElw52rtfdGWB8S9O5lndBl
 nMJ5Wq6IjL7A==
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Add VFIO mediated device support and IMS
 support for the idxd driver.
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, maz@kernel.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
        Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Yi L Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
        Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@intel.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
        Sanjay K Kumar <sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>, Jing Lin <jing.lin@intel.com>,
        kwankhede@nvidia.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, parav@mellanox.com,
        dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
References: <158751095889.36773.6009825070990637468.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com>
 <20200421235442.GO11945@mellanox.com>
 <CAPcyv4gMYz1wCYjfnujyGXP0jGehpb+dEYV7hJoAAsDsj9+afQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPcyv4hGX5jCzag8oQVUZ6Eq9GvZYLN_6kmBAgQMbrBbNzJ0yg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200423194941.GG13640@mellanox.com>
 <c50c2eda-88aa-00bc-7cd6-37cc26052cd5@linux.intel.com>
 <20200503222146.GD19158@mellanox.com>
From:   "Dey, Megha" <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <a3e93be9-7102-fd1b-3043-4e4d967a2bf7@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Sun, 3 May 2020 15:32:47 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200503222146.GD19158@mellanox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jason,

On 5/3/2020 3:21 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 03:31:14PM -0700, Dey, Megha wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> On 4/23/2020 12:49 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:17:50PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>>>
>>>> Per Megha's follow-up can you send the details about that other device
>>>> and help clear a path for a device-specific MSI addr/data table
>>>> format. Ever since HMM I've been sensitive, perhaps overly-sensitive,
>>>> to claims about future upstream users. The fact that you have an
>>>> additional use case is golden for pushing this into a common area and
>>>> validating the scope of the proposed API.
>>>
>>> I think I said it at plumbers, but yes, we are interested in this, and
>>> would like dynamic MSI-like interrupts available to the driver (what
>>> Intel calls IMS)
>>>
>>
>> So basically you are looking for a way to dynamically allocate the
>> platform-msi interrupts, correct?
> 
> The basic high level interface here seems fine, which is bascially a
> way for a driver to grab a bunch of platform-msi interrupts for its
> own use

ok!
>   
>> Since I don't have access to any of the platform-msi devices, it is hard for
>> me to test this code for other drivers expect idxd for now.
>> Once I submit the next round of patches, after addressing all the comments,
>> would it be possible for you to test this code for any of your devices?
> 
> Possibly, need to find time
> 
Sure, thanks!

> Jason
>