Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3456495ybz; Mon, 4 May 2020 03:23:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ2FJLijraKp9YUkWioQG6s9HTBE7cnVBgtj9vMuwr/GyUjbNeojvl/dg4rvVjrffKCwHTN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1757:: with SMTP id v23mr14398187edx.335.1588587835748; Mon, 04 May 2020 03:23:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588587835; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WzV82odFADhyV/2qaDRPNKB+UdyECebxFAuRjAIfMInGyvc/Rhb5eK9paOQISUltAE x0ibHu2AHVMcApYiQKZjg26NM/gLdlPbdmXTsm41Pr/LnPeYsdZgoi6YikaX/Id5XP/O ddxHrMEiUVUWN2SazRO3JEozyE53ozdJjnfHPIc5T5AvPYJZg0ls4UA5WLqIOuv7eT0V 53FRECyaG+YOOCr8MNw4IBXFkXMvimoQiY9jtAr+oV3hNZG7LA7dzLKImx2G7VhbwMvv GqaAFot2Zd/8s3OK9UfYWSCjC/WNDDK8c570YPGxc5w8H8R3hk3e8ZBjPB+zFT4cPcyO I+2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=PXKefhyNsVrqhbSaw0uWJPXnOxnNca0tzq80MmeMsgs=; b=uw1kHs/T9WPNgNMg9lyx29QxSDk1EPRCUklblPtypfXB7NO/L0l9uWPdYKhxH/43u1 /kL403zyO82GNiUdmGsDstzNYC7gf7IQ00ML+A+8Sxw73J2OcFPQx5lUPWUckaPs+Dhr 5jkLb+hXnP50YEzb8kO6NrkF9zjrzC84mR7d0NF6JuM12Qo90OGIXqI5fWZbGj9Lm+ja aGFd3JQfPtezJy+CfR6X1dM4XgigrL9zkBs4mYwbyG6NZK8ZRxs759Bx2acoss9c1uhS dkszmi85ur9c91D8CCAcf96/6JJFd3XC5lSZnnn83CMuv5360q37b/WlyG4pxO+CnEHr iyWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=OHD89EcN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q13si6821164eds.115.2020.05.04.03.23.32; Mon, 04 May 2020 03:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=OHD89EcN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728293AbgEDJUG (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 4 May 2020 05:20:06 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:55987 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727930AbgEDJUE (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2020 05:20:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588584003; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PXKefhyNsVrqhbSaw0uWJPXnOxnNca0tzq80MmeMsgs=; b=OHD89EcN3g5SVUY58hcKs1OwMJMdGDZjxmmZ7T0XCesH3kw94nnvrGxGehJLH8GihR1T2u w4/ZjpkqJ2Hy7ngyGD8ur+o99glxCfp5aScpfarH1TAAtscWyAOeTxA+wG2BErxVDwhR6g eQ7DYMWJk1/DZYN6SXetQLqy6bJ267s= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-331-vNVwR_DjMJCLNNweDWbWZA-1; Mon, 04 May 2020 05:19:59 -0400 X-MC-Unique: vNVwR_DjMJCLNNweDWbWZA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id f128so4551209wmf.8 for ; Mon, 04 May 2020 02:19:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PXKefhyNsVrqhbSaw0uWJPXnOxnNca0tzq80MmeMsgs=; b=P4T/wNHr7I3WQ7js26gKMRSMAsbn0flWIs74c4X/tjVbTxm5kov9aBSi2QvVUM28eX RPrXYr41M3IvH63RGqTVMm129hrVa+eq7CYL4cGfFmqM+fqEWPREtwgeuvGQg+69Zfui n2MazTZh2FNNyngmWymMwWmKipscM6OFSASYsg2ZwRlKga/pdCwsQuPcKlTa5iU8GKSZ xiS+4ggLf/lEVYyREtFJtf27SRxOSFRM9c+kIb3CVXQXWxj2Q3mlK2uyIGCSRlZAQ7hB 5c8eObmawDdajisIMDGsrWjWcGQiT0kfjn8WMSpZsOQvwSS4vD3+cUkWJv4Lu32qxFPC rDCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZF4tcRk7uM+cmQElnWaAQl68Jlw1SWxRgkCyEq5rqrfnGMZWAi 9tHlfr4w7Z2MvitgUpwg3afvkI0eQG7ktnAG/6c3ef9srAToNFJfwFd2P2/4kZW167NH31xW05s hcGyWg4iLhgB2fePlFyfFQKP2 X-Received: by 2002:adf:afd6:: with SMTP id y22mr3795460wrd.417.1588583998718; Mon, 04 May 2020 02:19:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:afd6:: with SMTP id y22mr3795438wrd.417.1588583998478; Mon, 04 May 2020 02:19:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.58] ([151.20.132.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i74sm18070472wri.49.2020.05.04.02.19.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 May 2020 02:19:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: ioapic: Introduce arch-specific check for lazy update EOI mechanism To: Suravee Suthikulpanit , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: rkrcmar@redhat.com, joro@8bytes.org, jon.grimm@amd.com, borisvk@bstnet.org References: <1588411495-202521-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 11:19:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/05/20 08:31, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: >> >> >> The re-entrancy happens because the irq state is the OR of >> the interrupt state and the resamplefd state.? That is, we don't >> want to show the state as 0 until we've had a chance to set the >> resamplefd.? But if the interrupt has _not_ gone low then we get an >> infinite loop. > > I'm not too familiar w/ the resamplefd.? I must have missed this part. > Could you please point out to me where the OR logic is? It's because kvm_ioapic_set_irq gets the actual state of the interrupt line from __kvm_irq_line_state before calling ioapic_set_irq. >> But in the case of level-triggered interrupts the VMEXIT already >> happens because TMR is set; only edge-triggered interrupts need >> the lazy invocation of the ack notifier.? > > For AVIC, EOI write for level-triggered would have also be trapped. Yes, I was talking about AVIC only there. > And yes, edge-triggered needs lazy ack notifier. > >> So this should be the fix: >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c >> index 7668fed1ce65..ca2d73cd00a3 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c >> @@ -225,12 +225,12 @@ static int ioapic_set_irq(struct kvm_ioapic >> *ioapic, unsigned int irq, >> ????? } >> ? ????? /* >> -???? * AMD SVM AVIC accelerate EOI write and do not trap, >> -???? * in-kernel IOAPIC will not be able to receive the EOI. >> +???? * AMD SVM AVIC accelerate EOI write iff the interrupt is level >> +???? * triggered, in-kernel IOAPIC will not be able to receive the EOI. > > Actually, it should be "AMD SVM AVIC accelerate EOI write iff the > interrupt is _edge_ triggered". Of course, thanks. Paolo