Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030220AbWCHWF0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:05:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030223AbWCHWFZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:05:25 -0500 Received: from mx.pathscale.com ([64.160.42.68]:47083 "EHLO mx.pathscale.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030220AbWCHWFY (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:05:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define flush_wc, a way to flush write combining store buffers From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" To: Andi Kleen Cc: Alan Cox , akpm@osdl.org, paulus@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, bcrl@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200603081535.25515.ak@suse.de> References: <1141855591.10606.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200603081535.25515.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:05:47 -0800 Message-Id: <1141855547.27555.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.90 (2.5.90-2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 664 Lines: 21 On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 15:35 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > How is this different to mmiowb() ? > > I think he intends it to be a flush instead of an ordering. > (something like CLFLUSH for WC areas) Exactly. mmiowb guarantees ordering, but says nothing about timing. This would guarantee ordering, affect WC store buffers if present, and try to work in a timely manner. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/