Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 4 May 2020 10:15:32 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, frextrite@gmail.com,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>, kernel-team@android.com,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        peterz@infradead.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        rcu@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        vpillai@digitalocean.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] RCU dyntick nesting counter cleanups for rcu -dev
Message-ID: <20200504171532.GR2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <20200504120505.89351-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200504120505.89351-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 08:05:00AM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> These patches clean up the usage of dynticks nesting counters simplifying the
> code, while preserving the usecases.
> 
> It is a much needed simplification, makes the code less confusing, and prevents
> future bugs such as those that arise from forgetting that the
> dynticks_nmi_nesting counter is not a simple counter and can be "crowbarred" in
> common situations.
> 
> rcutorture testing with all TREE RCU configurations succeed with
> CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y and CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y.
> 
> v1->v2:
> - Rebase on v5.6-rc6
> 
> v2->v3:
> - Rebase on rcu/dev with adjustments for tasks-RCU.

Thank you!

But this does not apply to any of v5.6-rc6, v5.7-rc1, or v5.7-rc2.

Where should I be trying to apply it?

							Thanx, Paul

> Joel Fernandes (Google) (4):
> Revert b8c17e6664c4 ("rcu: Maintain special bits at bottom of
> ->dynticks counter")
> rcu/tree: Add better tracing for dyntick-idle
> rcu/tree: Clean up dynticks counter usage
> rcu/tree: Remove dynticks_nmi_nesting counter
> 
> Madhuparna Bhowmik (1):
> trace: events: rcu: Change description of rcu_dyntick trace event
> 
> .../Data-Structures/Data-Structures.rst       |  31 +--
> Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst               |   6 +-
> include/linux/rcutiny.h                       |   3 -
> include/trace/events/rcu.h                    |  29 +--
> kernel/rcu/rcu.h                              |   4 -
> kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 199 +++++++-----------
> kernel/rcu/tree.h                             |   4 +-
> kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h                       |   4 +-
> 8 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.26.2.526.g744177e7f7-goog
>