Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3897805ybz; Mon, 4 May 2020 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIiDfJLeQvb2A1AqPu6disMvsKSU9OSWhcjNNaKQ8JwzznX860w9CmaqKbXfFiaIu0lTpXe X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:28e:: with SMTP id l14mr15442664edv.184.1588617865920; Mon, 04 May 2020 11:44:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588617865; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zrKnPc5BDfmWlFEUyw7tawVIU0OYcBhtSfCHKJ1AeK+7vuEl5/A3qKrqbIPL0piJob stLkMBAvPr5uXYsqL8DTtZ7mF5zlEhPhAG5TV7bc0+RvYADE3nwJkswN6IHyqzjQteX6 sLGulx7QNmVA/aK4ZYrSQCcK595oEaBuPKhxq430ET/USiriK8l0wBsStm17vAu3YD2M jAsq6oerg+KyIHYTb98lrJvzKVU94+n3l0257KoOH0nnBeLMK9zhD/S+zvC6ysWGjOuS YQpf2aXrZhU51wWX+gCJD7hQnHAW/zDeXfbkhetlmfXmgtWPCj0zDN6HBY1u1LahHi27 PA+w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=XBh6XPBYlCWQxEZWyVo5WWtoSozKEquCfAQVo3B+UXE=; b=CxUgp25pqqJMGHBHRnfbzLGHt1h6QOi5JqEk4U4e0/aSZz5SE/+kzMhHVszcviaFEC zEU72Kf7kNxCJRNoUZTNxljuYfumH2ZpHizyXs68lZbAL2fYYY5GpDxU6yM6B1IP/KIo ncZBfTxWUPJHopiLKSRYBVNy6kcBmnGIk8I3WANAFP7VlF1PE/hHSJDeaa9tX/IrdWqt T/QN/dRK13SDK0rIgoWfd2Sq4hB+7ilhRnAWOyRj+68GM2MM7vBzsIvSwcG45bJ3TJ7J F9WFQX1iC3yhajaiyOx19ZaUNmHrEl3hTfehDXIMq1PSI2xq3bzDXJLYlUwRva27m9/5 i4NA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y18si6871307edr.442.2020.05.04.11.44.02; Mon, 04 May 2020 11:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729092AbgEDPve (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 4 May 2020 11:51:34 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48040 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726509AbgEDPvd (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2020 11:51:33 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BCEAFAC; Mon, 4 May 2020 15:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 17:51:30 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: rostedt , linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton , Shile Zhang , Andy Lutomirski , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dave Hansen , Tzvetomir Stoyanov Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: Sync vmalloc mappings in pcpu_alloc() and free_percpu() Message-ID: <20200504155130.GK8135@suse.de> References: <20200429054857.66e8e333@oasis.local.home> <20200430191434.GC8135@suse.de> <20200430211308.74a994dc@oasis.local.home> <1902703609.78863.1588300015661.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20200430223919.50861011@gandalf.local.home> <20200504151236.GI8135@suse.de> <99290786.82178.1588606126392.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20200504153135.GJ8135@suse.de> <1533922227.82188.1588606723786.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1533922227.82188.1588606723786.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:38:43AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On May 4, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Joerg Roedel jroedel@suse.de wrote: > > Tried this before, actually I put it into the caller of > > pcpu_mem_zalloc(), but that didn't fix the problem for me. Stevens > > test-case still hangs the machine. > > That's unexpected. > > Did you confirm that those hangs were also caused by percpu allocations ? No, I didn't dig deeper on that hang. I can probably do tomorrow. Regards, Joerg