Received: by 2002:a25:23cc:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j195csp50970ybj; Mon, 4 May 2020 15:55:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLYFHA+qb/sPKikY4h+U0jGps9rmIDBh/CkWtkNCsEnnLwDr9ayS6lAr1/DyMjU6I2tiq94 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:34c4:: with SMTP id h4mr41536ejb.167.1588632943629; Mon, 04 May 2020 15:55:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588632943; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OXEieW3AArt1fESBf5nt7i4iVVo9gWcJKuydGO0EPPccpfHDUTS6SLASb5GBLhbLHd BoMbAj93DuFFCtKOuDEKzmJC/Zuriw9NEzKweeQVryKa+V99MfJMYv3DAQgAMqPyhg92 TUv5kytbtDxJLLM2J6zS6mH3VHU9szxC32Zn6/KGA/3U4VVuHS5xCi0QwCBTT9wFLuUi xcefppUO4gPdYMDHt0Dn2zKxM8rcu3RtsTjjdTQnzN7JU6qICsflzj5wXXxl/5oO1C2/ skWsCLitt4aBwSPWTSXN2ojOhMnaXUOA4YX4kcg7Mnfi5Svaq2ICKyP5K6rEqka+irs6 io4Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=TlGQvxa4ZoTlkS3uwvgeQHJhmGCbxfklMLyyEyAa7OY=; b=qi90CHEv2/Oa7dsKIE4puQxqT+ZSFOuilMLrN95ft70Gb/LWV+nAhI3p1kssKIQOXL rAyoO21T0mmFLvrXGBOg0VKEN5Zmb1oDX4q5EgmOHKGk0RrcHRXPISUo2s40HGkfdzGE 50Xlslu/EOXOQfa3VaZTfGkLoobYU5wdiiN69cDlIv+y57IgiMDZEsrN1OTR/PXUFBaB CWlnWDsW6DHV9HYVcRgdtkNg6+eCABH1PJA/NhDFMiLwtH4ZWLw52+jyumw98FNbb8g1 uAQ8BMA558++5HjH28cC/7PU/cYkxNODTPyxbECyBb8XpORz1GrBevYQmIL/wsYsX2S0 koAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=SmNRMKW9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dk10si220718edb.3.2020.05.04.15.55.20; Mon, 04 May 2020 15:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=SmNRMKW9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726487AbgEDWvx (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 4 May 2020 18:51:53 -0400 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:54530 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726291AbgEDWvx (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2020 18:51:53 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-73-42-176-67.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.42.176.67]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A901720B717B; Mon, 4 May 2020 15:51:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com A901720B717B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1588632712; bh=TlGQvxa4ZoTlkS3uwvgeQHJhmGCbxfklMLyyEyAa7OY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=SmNRMKW9loVFwCG/K0n82fcbSosLA5AlKHNh9PPxohuV+WIHiV7kQqXjgu1kId1Tz M7Znn2wPlci5ysddHzsZQCaXDe1/ZZEy7U73IFQ1h2apD6MkOAaEk8/FhAlnl3VQgg 8R1enS/nld1g/KsJUf28+R+pyifNpF+kq0BnCvgo= Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ima: verify mprotect change is consistent with mmap policy To: Mimi Zohar , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jann Horn , Stephen Smalley , Eric Biggers , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1588627060-7399-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com> From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian Message-ID: <7812a3a7-f47d-c924-c12e-f417bb6f43dc@linux.microsoft.com> Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 15:51:47 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1588627060-7399-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/4/20 2:17 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: Hi Mimi, > +int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long prot) > +{ > + struct ima_template_desc *template; > + struct inode *inode; > + int result = 0; > + int action; > + u32 secid; > + int pcr; > + > + if (vma->vm_file && (prot & PROT_EXEC) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)) { Just a suggestion: Maybe you could do the negative of the above check and return, so that the block within the if statement doesn't have to be indented. > + inode = file_inode(vma->vm_file); > + > + security_task_getsecid(current, &secid); > + action = ima_get_action(inode, current_cred(), secid, MAY_EXEC, > + MMAP_CHECK, &pcr, &template, 0); > + > + if (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK) > + result = -EPERM; > + > + if ((action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK) || (action & IMA_MEASURE)) { action is checked for IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK bits in the previous if statement. Does it need to be checked again in the above if statement? > + struct file *file = vma->vm_file; > + char *pathbuf = NULL; > + const char *pathname; > + char filename[NAME_MAX]; > + > + pathname = ima_d_path(&file->f_path, &pathbuf, > + filename); > + integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_DATA, inode, > + pathname, "collect_data", > + "failed-mprotect", result, 0); > + > + if (pathbuf) > + __putname(pathbuf); > + } > + } > + return result; > +} thanks, -lakshmi