Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 07:57:04 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler
Message-ID: <20200505055704.GA3552@lst.de>
References: <20200424064338.538313-1-hch@lst.de> <20200424064338.538313-6-hch@lst.de> <202005041154.CC19F03@keescook>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <202005041154.CC19F03@keescook>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 12:01:11PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >  	if (error)
> > -		goto out;
> > +		goto out_free_buf;
> >  
> >  	/* careful: calling conventions are nasty here */
> 
> Is this comment still valid after doing these cleanups?

The comment is pretty old so I decided to keep it.  That being said
I'm not sure it really is very helpful.