Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 17:05:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 17:05:10 -0400 Received: from dsl-64-192-150-245.telocity.com ([64.192.150.245]:60690 "EHLO mail.communicationsboard.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 17:04:55 -0400 Message-ID: <016201c15b3d$30de1d00$2a040a0a@zeusinc.com> From: "Tom Sightler" To: "Alan Cox" Cc: "Tudor Bosman" , In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 17:04:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Everyone wants to bring up the Sklyarov case, but he didn't just expose the > > weakness of the code, his company actively sold a product for financial gain > > that circumvented the protection. While I still don't think the Sklyarov > > The Felten case is the more relevant one. OK, I need even more help here. Isn't it Felten the one doing the suing in that case. I need more clarification. I've tried to read both the EFF pages as well as other sources and I don't even see where he has been sued under the DMCA (although it does look like he was theatened with legal action from the RIAA). Has there been a recent ruling that I've been too busy to see lately. Thanks, Tom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/