Received: by 2002:a25:23cc:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j195csp765607ybj; Tue, 5 May 2020 07:15:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKlk6uKSX+v2lCg28KevfQWrvBtmRQ2QFJdLzkIj2/ZyH4UAmn/mZ2E6Lba9CRmr2OEIuM3 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1d23:: with SMTP id dh3mr2795317edb.349.1588688134249; Tue, 05 May 2020 07:15:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588688134; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BEZuwUvJ5DM5cmGnEXqaqtRIBOrvEHj9lhp6X+EyAGxmeU+HBlqFM1r+5CzyqS//XY jCNrBTW48rWI48onTNXumQo90vohdbToI1xaW5A7gXbs11stBOMrwKM4e27yB9g4UGM1 7TI+TLbNVc6anilB+7FwbiTQUO/Y/nS6t62uKzis6/Br/yq8kb7m6X/sZxdm0OVX/wBf Gp0fXnHI6uTeESyTxjNXtvBGaa7m83fCNP1qQ4hmQILXLPZWFTp8Od1hgkEmiAz8nGiN 6HoqalKP09ULoVQTEzAbJ6UYenVpiYnh9KjArmIT5Wah1C2xZ8JVtcy4gyCkyZBFsfPe HR8Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=9QocmiR79ciyCV8YIogR/mIbS+d3+LtRW/0KmEr7MtM=; b=tfVlYgPt4iNyZxrUTbzmBKQqj7N+yhjof3yV5w3mQabXk5vSwPIOf2Y1nNGZQDjcTF M/KEQpViHSUgChR+mIwNbX7bEP7WQ9RiDAq2e+VLws+BIYOsQPoEUNm4ZqVllslwUNe1 w0IYl52sghC5tIP+f9pOtVKMlyjhTGycyqY950KvrfUjNGdWQmdOjaQPT4QOMrChd1w3 ZGo7M0J+OZRlpBkJQ0TK/BYLHwsFi2O5GkikbMA28Lfloj39tHLbZB/M8ho0HoYnETlG Ct9TXGv0kUjlYZvlwYb34gPN1T+q8HwW5LWq9zF0qf/WeS6Y4StfImwGVLWSfBe7Yuib SgoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=c33eASpj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b9si1246660edx.31.2020.05.05.07.15.05; Tue, 05 May 2020 07:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=c33eASpj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729274AbgEEOM4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 May 2020 10:12:56 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:48972 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729219AbgEEOM4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2020 10:12:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588687974; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9QocmiR79ciyCV8YIogR/mIbS+d3+LtRW/0KmEr7MtM=; b=c33eASpjxykGTTat16XijkHaLXWb58lI0IqcNJJPtPhut7A8LNJZvd9EPsei2q+6r9YhA1 qPTf4BRKkHr7bLAzhdewDNGW/cKerZ33PLVbqhIGqGdU8CvibQsUIDiKsFd181KWDZ2MSU 4RoeCKM/KvUBXtmd4AU3cu6b/StZotU= Received: from mail-qt1-f197.google.com (mail-qt1-f197.google.com [209.85.160.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-119-6OnTRXnfMh6jQtRIW_mcTg-1; Tue, 05 May 2020 10:12:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6OnTRXnfMh6jQtRIW_mcTg-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f197.google.com with SMTP id e44so1799150qta.9 for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 07:12:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=9QocmiR79ciyCV8YIogR/mIbS+d3+LtRW/0KmEr7MtM=; b=pHnFSoiYt++iv5kMD8tFnDYSscZ7mXGD2AOw8RXaN8HZg2KOWzybaqmsT3pcxbRoE3 4ItENiKygewLxwa7JOUTPBr0tzlB4UOUG+HBi/gs0OUL0h7q/glKOiZrHhkkdhJfa5Re Bw9YY9HzXclDBbun2PABFvkaFm3dEc5CZQbYR9SH7xAsi6H8DFkQAVxGIHB0z2RidRNN sznccOYJhN7sb8sjl1MS85dnjVljiQ5jdsJ/16JHsRNKALJjFNjTImXi7fM4VyQdyW/o JUfoB1tuvyh/Spm4t2tL5cFxZKZiaYZrk+JwthMzBA2fEd8+Z1Diyhj/2Y/asHgLHREQ zaSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYjzmr/Co8OSMDua3vixPjzksiWhjh62mCtomUSBB4Z0ZGHNf2B J6UHInEzRGIJO2v6ikJ5qZXSWsR9KgS/LEGcUU7pltOuGzF+pGIHVAQPM3wUDULF4Cc5Ax3gpKw 1R26L1GQ3NxhMeHg7K+brg7io X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:112c:: with SMTP id p12mr844433qkk.313.1588687967629; Tue, 05 May 2020 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:112c:: with SMTP id p12mr844411qkk.313.1588687967341; Tue, 05 May 2020 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xz-x1 ([2607:9880:19c0:32::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v5sm1810925qkg.9.2020.05.05.07.12.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 May 2020 07:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 10:12:45 -0400 From: Peter Xu To: Sean Christopherson Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix a warning in __kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init() Message-ID: <20200505141245.GH6299@xz-x1> References: <20200504190526.84456-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20200505013929.GA17225@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200505013929.GA17225@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 06:39:29PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:05:26PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > > GCC 10.0.1 gives me this warning when building KVM: > > > > warning: ‘nr_pages_avail’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > > 2442 | for ( ; start_gfn <= end_gfn; start_gfn += nr_pages_avail) { > > > > It should not happen, but silent it. > > Heh, third times a charm? This has been reported and proposed twice > before[1][2]. Are you using any custom compiler flags? E.g. -O3 is known > to cause false positives with -Wmaybe-uninitialized. No, what I did was only upgrading to Fedora 32 (which will auto-upgrade GCC), so it should be using the default params of whatever provided. > > If we do end up killing this warning, I'd still prefer to use > uninitialized_var() over zero-initializing the variable. > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200218184756.242904-1-oupton@google.com > [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207173 OK, I didn't know this is a known problem and discussions going on. But I guess it would be good to address this sooner because it could become a common warning very soon after people upgrades gcc. Thanks, -- Peter Xu