Received: by 2002:a25:23cc:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j195csp850849ybj; Tue, 5 May 2020 08:31:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKuI1kqbf1y/SUJwAuCWwWWv6KDnRNFVAOM++BHSI9skHk7K1aQ1LzlVjsFiwW7ROsYUG11 X-Received: by 2002:adf:e751:: with SMTP id c17mr4636322wrn.351.1588692701281; Tue, 05 May 2020 08:31:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588692701; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xAjKEqws2mj+Asl7eh9p1SDoduLcq0vRMXIqVYwE8TyDMqpuQX0bqPrtYaoy/z6/tT J5HFamOAddXCzzOcSW5BY80e3yGdCcR0T2VMjSgcK5oDZdoPCJVug90QxHFOEtdpmo4Z e7qvrZrCZTQFg1VDB231yMsC1BTYUqv2yrXWoNir2b+Q5VdCyj6zhYOnFJQ9n5CgDRAo kRlJ3moWjPiXYZqcBhKmqG2A2cecNckmZ91mj9uIyWLM6ZDUQ0gj+/BDkhu6SI+4NzYT W227G3rmEWIwvV+4/WAQgZbrMzxpUW4IIrGep3zcKoEyEx5U1rsNXuv8Vie5VET5JDMp MSWw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=VWvZph0AXmIJ5KnOylL+NGpkZMi/vkF6ecg1nOcEFfw=; b=sUXQp1QVRxL6NUe69zUZgfvzA6OhyO3Hqkndx0/eHRBS4d9s0eGgQM0AxX5lz6ZGVV wtS8P5/YQtFzkZpUDhjbd34twr2toq4038y2O66bS1kCpVrAiyoCcUlIDUiMUY64wSgX DeDnZPA9gEKi1kJHMeUIuyTp7/uTydF1WHbeY8cL5ZvSRXGXdd13cwq5XmjZWMD9oVXD e2eYmrjYdPi57ndyXjNAAKQ8wN0ykMON6DQr4KsWDql0Y55sjF9bp/TVAs9FzNBl8UcD TL0s3i03TFWi1dZdma8m2Tn+SjAHK1I9mhyNaWRHuoBwyz24inGDBesCFOTzwngvGk7o MLXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bu22si1401445edb.507.2020.05.05.08.31.17; Tue, 05 May 2020 08:31:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729641AbgEEP2l (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 May 2020 11:28:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60554 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729365AbgEEP2l (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2020 11:28:41 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8F21C061A0F; Tue, 5 May 2020 08:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0CF5737; Tue, 5 May 2020 15:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 09:28:38 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/29] Convert files to ReST - part 2 Message-ID: <20200505092838.4b1ff075@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20200428130128.22c4b973@lwn.net> References: <20200428130128.22c4b973@lwn.net> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:01:28 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > So I'm happy to merge this set, but there is one thing that worries me a > bit... > > > fs/cachefiles/Kconfig | 4 +- > > fs/coda/Kconfig | 2 +- > > fs/configfs/inode.c | 2 +- > > fs/configfs/item.c | 2 +- > > fs/fscache/Kconfig | 8 +- > > fs/fscache/cache.c | 8 +- > > fs/fscache/cookie.c | 2 +- > > fs/fscache/object.c | 4 +- > > fs/fscache/operation.c | 2 +- > > fs/locks.c | 2 +- > > include/linux/configfs.h | 2 +- > > include/linux/fs_context.h | 2 +- > > include/linux/fscache-cache.h | 4 +- > > include/linux/fscache.h | 42 +- > > include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 2 +- > > I'd feel a bit better if I could get an ack or two from filesystem folks > before I venture that far out of my own yard...what say you all? It's been another week and nobody has complained, so I'm taking that as assent; the series has been applied. Thanks, jon