Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751843AbWCILVp (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 06:21:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751847AbWCILVp (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 06:21:45 -0500 Received: from ns9.hostinglmi.net ([213.194.149.146]:37003 "EHLO ns9.hostinglmi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751843AbWCILVo (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 06:21:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 12:22:59 +0100 From: DervishD To: Rudolf Randal Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers. Message-ID: <20060309112241.GC14004@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Rudolf Randal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <161717d50603080659t53462cd0k53969c0d33e06321@mail.gmail.com> <21d7e9970603090202v22205fc6ha5b4cec12f0a0507@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: DervishD X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns9.hostinglmi.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dervishd.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3808 Lines: 81 Hi Rudolf :) * Rudolf Randal dixit: > I was wondering how many direct letters from lkml people have been > written to vendors asking for cooperation with regard to specs, > joint development or other solutions for open source drivers for > their devices. Not exactly kernel related, but anyway: I wrote almost a month ago to Menarini Diagnostics. They make glucometers, and the latest model they sell can be connected to the PC with a special cable. Of course, Windows. Since no Linux support is provided for this useful device, I did an offer to Menarini: if they provided me with the cable and the specs, I'll write a Linux driver and/or a Linux application to support *their* product at no cost. I would do it for free because I'm very interested in connecting my glucometer to my Linux box. I made clear that the driver and/or app would be GPL'd, but on the other hand I made clear too that I won't release the specs they would give me if they didn't want to (except of course those bits exposed by the source code itself). I haven't got any answer from them. I can use other glucometer, of course, but this one is, IMHO, the best one in the market and I don't think any other vendor would give me specs for their products. And please note that I'm not talking about all the specifications of the glucometer: they can keep secret the way the glucometer makes the measurements, I don't give a heck about that. I only want the *communication* specs, so I'm able to retrieve data from the glucometer through the cable (which is USB, AFAIK, so probably it won't need a new driver). > I too feel strongly about oss and GPL - but the tone on this list > (often) might be too much to handle for some people! Probably, but if I make something for free, I think I should have the right to impose distribution conditions, and GPL restrictions seem to be very reasonable to me: if you use my work, you cannot avoid others using it, and if you make a modification of my work, you cannot distribute a binary of that modified work without the source. For me, not getting an answer from a vendor is too much to handle. Having to buy a cable myself and doing reverse engineering to make something I own work with my operating system is too much to handle. I don't know how much Menarini paid for the Windows version of the software. Probably more than the entire Linux kernel will cost to produce in its entire life. The cost of a Linux version for them will be a cable and a PDF document of the communication specification, which probably will be a known protocol. They don't want to do it because: a) they don't understand a word of the open source movement and how it can be used to save money; or b) they're so stupid, stubborn and money avid that won't do anything that doesn't involve money, even if the money goes out of their own pockets! > Maybe request for an open discussion with some of these vendors > would bring about some of their concerns over IP and other issues > and could maybe even open up for some progress ?? I utterly agree. The tone in this list may be "strong", but it is an open list nonetheless and I think all Linux hackers out there will be happy to hear from some vendor doing a cooperation offer. Up to this point, Menarini doesn't seem to be one of them, though. Ra?l N??ez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/