Received: by 2002:a25:23cc:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j195csp1193038ybj; Tue, 5 May 2020 15:07:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJDjNMAp4oU/YgbLxe97Q74RlnteAl0HBllAS2C8t0ERXx4Y0v0z9nXNrkAmGfnTwqbuOmo X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:698:: with SMTP id f24mr4435928edy.260.1588716465651; Tue, 05 May 2020 15:07:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588716465; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pyjx6ZczSFKEUqefPGHnPieAGoW+klOUh/mGlbae0x9WmSrjUrmqCIbmpCT+w2Okbq EcXnOuL96UHsIdDnaFQT/FiQ3sn2IVR/0GJYZ9IkNqdl1NrUr4/8eWZndpgwpHKoo2sG yJflV2JPZdZdk5qW6iQ7as7H9kT3rv1dpEbrUEDzh1b2xiCIapRPCXhhF2g9uEWFzPqM V8tC5pwfCsSyOF6HZ382SsY7hiM02dp5K9IKik9dTZsrBgnQNXyBO5kEs/7980NDesWd J9McKjCeTw6VbzoZ+9yoZIXmOkVA9OD0pTjTdTSZ5De4A2Tj6oX1fWBXp2KxdBsbWYfl HD0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from; bh=21Yv1JC/4OpARCIeqc75YguSERJ02tJ3Mi78UMG7lK4=; b=XQeu45q47eo6TYK1Dk73XCcHBVQz4OHKFFNVtiR/kwRWjwgtWXE6ANglETvekwC1K9 tjM7j5/MXV+s3EcIgLEevumV7UX2M4VipkbmIxI5E66qSyFgXaBzgMk1XhEFB+gZReaG dDcu8QSlPKOKfx1acPgUJwlPxJZGTyOUrbOleMGePScNqhpIc1gFaUCBGw2+sZ6RofDa 39hHL1wBvvKlf+oeNcpVV55k3RURhGkv3rVdses/MCj0GHTUKxcza1Ye/bVrauXYjxnO sWkZd2dueSc5kcOBMQdof5SQQzEP4j124mwZxY8Af3KxrEf2A0xmir5mp3710AgGS4fA EI2g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bu17si1967649edb.124.2020.05.05.15.07.19; Tue, 05 May 2020 15:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728853AbgEEWFh (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 May 2020 18:05:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38170 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727785AbgEEWFg (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2020 18:05:36 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DEE8C061A0F for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 15:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jW5gX-0005sF-0O; Wed, 06 May 2020 00:05:05 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6AB101001F5; Wed, 6 May 2020 00:05:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: paulmck@kernel.org Cc: LKML , x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Alexandre Chartre , Frederic Weisbecker , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Masami Hiramatsu , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Joel Fernandes , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Brian Gerst , Mathieu Desnoyers , Josh Poimboeuf , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 3 11/29] rcu: Provide rcu_irq_exit_preempt() In-Reply-To: <20200505220224.GT2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 00:05:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhamnilr.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Paul E. McKenney" writes: > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:44:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> Interrupts and exceptions invoke rcu_irq_enter() on entry and need to >> invoke rcu_irq_exit() before they either return to the interrupted code or >> invoke the scheduler due to preemption. >> >> The general assumption is that RCU idle code has to have preemption >> disabled so that a return from interrupt cannot schedule. So the return >> from interrupt code invokes rcu_irq_exit() and preempt_schedule_irq(). >> >> If there is any imbalance in the rcu_irq/nmi* invocations or RCU idle code >> had preemption enabled then this goes unnoticed until the CPU goes idle or >> some other RCU check is executed. >> >> Provide rcu_irq_exit_preempt() which can be invoked from the >> interrupt/exception return code in case that preemption is enabled. It >> invokes rcu_irq_exit() and contains a few sanity checks in case that >> CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled to catch such issues directly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner >> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" >> Cc: Joel Fernandes > > The ->dynticks_nmi_nesting field is going away at some point, but > there is always "git merge". ;-) Yes. The logistics for merging all of this is going to be interesting :)