Received: by 2002:a25:23cc:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j195csp1280994ybj; Tue, 5 May 2020 17:05:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIHGQXPSequCKiq1SspT0UAzxLbNTLh8Vjgn5jYuCGQUH+ouHl3KtKmNdjTR37r2hbUNbAW X-Received: by 2002:a50:ef18:: with SMTP id m24mr4764573eds.281.1588723529914; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:05:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588723529; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0+KhKHGIYt99kaxrj92xkGhO07N9OjiJ65aeLMg5/+3SdLCRYwbkW+62pESoofkcTx KazIzWyF/YRMuUCXBBquvW2kTtoAIPnKIB14s6DAHgrEHL5Cjs76eNQvwtmLPVR7W6jE j0Fh7TqYdPLPa2QTOkialL+QkyT6QKcD8+DnmyqSMj/X7SYLuhOwYL8WL1Z/IUdwdbc8 YFj2UbWwUMmwmcnxRezrVYsQz4dWBNjvtmC1KbcAdLy5NXn8m6ovl9vrOZinUH49CYg7 51FNyT+aMOPt7ztPQqV8E1ELI/xteO6Qe66I5LU4aOwC1z8PLkHS4R53peNALF0IVCkj fLdQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=FX6e20EgkCKDRplcbN8VIX8Q54OU7fQsuv0YDgw22to=; b=vgzQ1JE6ZP92SBdYd5XQXefOBag7wV+8Y4pc8wl3XuJfGk2k3gwyZa0wa2/quLKE2z jFtjc+kzQ+eV+jEE73fYTepuTYK0q65BpHx3YIKBDJagcKINHWf4s07fE6nWW1JZlqiU 0RGWXR3yoU9rrqAmrwp9uk48/CmNRlxB0HVWev5eLgLjZnLnlvdI2i8wZutGl+dH3pG6 qRD7PlXzMVJvFh9b1G+PGBFek1VzemVyqaMJ0DGnh8G14yCSlF+qmVyZMYMuFtBjQuq/ T3t1VNy6fdKSajyaMRWQ9otATCPgUArZWSvcDSapOZT1Mngi0AvYBSLISy4RkVJS/0l3 c6Zw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@cs.washington.edu header.s=goo201206 header.b=DGRBrU5l; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=cs.washington.edu Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d8si77655edp.582.2020.05.05.17.05.07; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@cs.washington.edu header.s=goo201206 header.b=DGRBrU5l; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=cs.washington.edu Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729728AbgEFADi (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 May 2020 20:03:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56496 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729704AbgEFADf (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2020 20:03:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x644.google.com (mail-pl1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::644]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97DB0C061A10 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 17:03:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x644.google.com with SMTP id b6so1506780plz.13 for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:03:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.washington.edu; s=goo201206; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=FX6e20EgkCKDRplcbN8VIX8Q54OU7fQsuv0YDgw22to=; b=DGRBrU5lGGOAfmrpZkIzPhRETbzDiQU82spA1HQTJz0PJGRxx2nnsDinlYJB08t5Gs N9qJ+YxSQDx6R8jEiQy/+pinOvUHPL0UQsiyoQHMaWua1KOwacCH4h3fA7qjmKdgQx60 egKbXI77B4sIMlPNVqIq+HeFM8XxaWfSoTxPs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=FX6e20EgkCKDRplcbN8VIX8Q54OU7fQsuv0YDgw22to=; b=YCpw25mteI4/ZEx5VauNzxhBOcFi5JXG+XiRVQONoXIjVQ3chIgVk+kG/EWICBUGXn EpvMl7IEtOzXdpzcyIy+HYUqXMC6sxpCIONRdYn+DHUa/et8THipTuP+oIgmhh+LcAxu jvNpSXDSFrinELHU47ENJmar6a+DiVx4U2i6KOxkUmCrfbJwoDxJuN55zOQSnPlpE4on Y/gP8LFrAd3/anyFNnIPGz+KuhZ3KyUpvfztDdcW9DQdtj4Cry/iUbx5wFEPOISUrL+f PMztHO3fR9Sh8iL7UAFUOBOP4E8aJlVljwUMCfL2zx1vE3Ig0Phty8rae5cCdgNyS0j4 NcWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaFKmUuAjtHYOtSW+a31vvr/wtQVTNlfDabIwzdNWOaYu8yvcht zMC8cYhotEiyt2LJgQR1waIRFw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7065:: with SMTP id f92mr3527567pjk.160.1588723414979; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:03:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-53-94-119.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [73.53.94.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u3sm133912pfn.217.2020.05.05.17.03.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 May 2020 17:03:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Luke Nelson X-Google-Original-From: Luke Nelson To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Luke Nelson , Xi Wang , =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20T=C3=B6pel?= , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] bpf, riscv: Optimize BPF_JSET BPF_K using andi on RV64 Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 17:03:20 -0700 Message-Id: <20200506000320.28965-5-luke.r.nels@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200506000320.28965-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com> References: <20200506000320.28965-1-luke.r.nels@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch optimizes BPF_JSET BPF_K by using a RISC-V andi instruction when the BPF immediate fits in 12 bits, instead of first loading the immediate to a temporary register. Examples of generated code with and without this optimization: BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) without optimization: 20: li t1,2 24: and t1,a0,t1 28: bnez t1,0x30 BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) with optimization: 20: andi t1,a0,2 24: bnez t1,0x2c BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) without optimization: 20: li t1,2 24: mv t2,a0 28: slli t2,t2,0x20 2c: srli t2,t2,0x20 30: slli t1,t1,0x20 34: srli t1,t1,0x20 38: and t1,t2,t1 3c: bnez t1,0x44 BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JSET, R1, 2, 1) with optimization: 20: andi t1,a0,2 24: bnez t1,0x2c In these examples, because the upper 32 bits of the sign-extended immediate are 0, BPF_JMP BPF_JSET and BPF_JMP32 BPF_JSET are equivalent and therefore the JIT produces identical code for them. Co-developed-by: Xi Wang Signed-off-by: Xi Wang Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson --- arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index b07cef952019..6cfd164cbe88 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -792,8 +792,6 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx, case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSGE | BPF_K: case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K: case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSLE | BPF_K: - case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K: - case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSET | BPF_K: rvoff = rv_offset(i, off, ctx); s = ctx->ninsns; if (imm) { @@ -813,15 +811,28 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx, /* Adjust for extra insns */ rvoff -= (e - s) << 2; + emit_branch(BPF_OP(code), rd, rs, rvoff, ctx); + break; - if (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_JSET) { - /* Adjust for and */ - rvoff -= 4; - emit(rv_and(rs, rd, rs), ctx); - emit_branch(BPF_JNE, rs, RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, ctx); + case BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K: + case BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JSET | BPF_K: + rvoff = rv_offset(i, off, ctx); + s = ctx->ninsns; + if (is_12b_int(imm)) { + emit(rv_andi(RV_REG_T1, rd, imm), ctx); } else { - emit_branch(BPF_OP(code), rd, rs, rvoff, ctx); + emit_imm(RV_REG_T1, imm, ctx); + emit(rv_and(RV_REG_T1, rd, RV_REG_T1), ctx); } + /* For jset32, we should clear the upper 32 bits of t1, but + * sign-extension is sufficient here and saves one instruction, + * as t1 is used only in comparison against zero. + */ + if (!is64 && imm < 0) + emit(rv_addiw(RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_T1, 0), ctx); + e = ctx->ninsns; + rvoff -= (e - s) << 2; + emit_branch(BPF_JNE, RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_ZERO, rvoff, ctx); break; /* function call */ -- 2.17.1